User talk:70.246.144.94

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Dear 70/Advanced Lipodissolve, or whoever you may be,

No one pays me to do this! That is the beauty of it.

Anyway, your most recent edits have been quite restrained. That said, don't you think "INTERNATIONAL REGULATION" is a little mellow for bans in 3 countries? I think so. So how about we settle on "International regulation: Lipodissolve banned in Brazil, England, and Canada".

On another matter that seems to have irked you, I am happy to try to compromise. Seriously, if you have a good reference that explains the Brazil ban (a real honest to God reference that is NOT random hearsay) as to the nature of the ban, by all means put it up and I won't take it down. I take down stuff that:

-- feels like someone is selling something (and yes, you seem to be) -- does not contain solid verifiable references -- something that makes me suspect the editor is MAKING MONEY by selling compounded drugs to people outside the right regulatory channels. . . .

And yes, you have done this in the past. And yes, even though are not admitting it, I would bet money you are affiliated with Advanced Lipodissolve, .Fig, or whatever you will call yourself next. Say what you want, but your edits indicate you are making money. My edits show that I have nothing to sell.

Just know this: I am watching. If you try to sell stuff on wikipedia, I will take down your links.


A


Dear Anonymous:

Got your recent note. Thanks for the info.

Seriously, if you can get a real reference explaining the Brazil ban, PLEASE post it. I cannot find any verifiable resource confirming your 'self-injection' explanation. But let's post it if it is true and verifiable. The ANVISA statement about the ban is published and posted on the site and makes NO MENTION of self injection.

I just want to make sure we are right on the facts.

A —Preceding unsigned comment added by Agincourtboy (talk • contribs) 14:45, August 30, 2007 (UTC)