User talk:70.245.237.113

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Trimmis, are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Netkinetic (t/c/@) 03:39, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Spore (video game), you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Netkinetic (t/c/@) 03:40, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a week for repeated disruptive vandalism. Sr13 (T|C) 03:55, 9 May 2007 (UTC)


This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Do not think it was fair to block me as I just recieved a final warning which I did not break. You can't give someone a final warning, and then just then block right after giving it even though I haven't done anything since the last warning."

Decline reason: "Your IP has been a vandal-only account. Your history of warnings and blocks has not given me the trust to unblock you. — Sr13 (T"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Well thank you for ignoring the issue of my blocking, and not fully explaining why I was given a final warning, and then suddenly blocked. That does make sense to you, becuase it sure does not make any sense to me. You don't have people go around giving people warnings, and then blocking them right after even if they were following the warning's instructions.