User talk:70.188.24.125

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] 7 Days Limit

You should be warned that similar action will be taken if you do not stop your constant vandalism of the It's a Wonderful World links section. Machinamar 14:44, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Look, it isn't vandalism, or me trying to be some egghead dickhead. Just...trust me, and keep the site off of Wikipedia for the next 2 weeks or so. :-/ just trust me on that...

No. I will ask you one more time to stop vandalizing an encyclopedia article for personal reasons. If you refuse to follow my request, consider yourself reported. You have been warned. Machinamar 17:37, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Have I given you a reason NOT to trust me?! :-/ Just trust me on this one, and in 2-3 weeks, you're gonna wanna kiss me. Trust me.

While I'm glad that you have stopped the vandalism temporarily, and that you have added the site onto the page by yourself, I do not trust you, and cannot trust you on "this one." And even though you are of my opposite sex, I would never want to kiss you. Machinamar 21:50, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

I was just trying to be nice geez. And besides, only reason I put it back up is cause a friend asked me really nicely, despite all my efforts to explain. There are more negatives than positives this way, so, like, don't blame me for anything bad that happens. : <

BTW, whats all this chaos I'm hearing about at the site? >.> quite personally, I'm not a big fan of getting dragged into a whole huge war.

[edit] Reversals at Barefoot: Please beware of the 3-revert-rule

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. –Henning Makholm 22:23, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

I am, but any evidence I provide is ignored.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule on Barefoot. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

CitiCat 02:18, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I broke no such rule. I provided evidence that proved the contesting side wrong, but they refused, and outright ignored the evidence. I demand this block be removed at once."


Decline reason: "Yes, you did break the rule, so stop lying. You did not provide "evidence" proving the "contesting side wrong," instead engaging in personal attacks and making a fool of yourself. Block upheld. — Kurykh 04:14, 21 July 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Actually, no, I didn't. As stated, I have provided evidence, which is FINALLY receiving recognition of copyrighted theft, as well as a possible identity mishap. I didn't break any rules. :< Once again requesting for this block to be removed."


Decline reason: "Your request does not address the block rationale of WP:3RR. — Sandstein 06:59, 21 July 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This is, in every sense of the word, retarded. Some creep, is stealing photography, posing as the subject's mother, I'm trying to stop it...and you all are trying to block me.

Wonderful going Wikipedia!!!! :-D Continue to serve the community as finely as now!!!!

[edit] Sign your posts

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thanks, and happy editing.

--JForget 02:51, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Warning

As you have not warned me ever before, I find your warning laughable. Let the barefoot thing go. You're just being a troll trying to link it everywhere out of context. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 02:56, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Oh, and: You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 03:00, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Think I care? You're going about vandalizing. I ain't taking that shit. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.188.24.125 (talk) 03:05:27, August 19, 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked for 72 hours Spartaz Humbug! 11:37, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your recent edits

Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button Image:Wikisigbutton.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 16:59, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your recent edits

Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button Image:Wikisigbutton.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 21:55, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] September 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Persona 4, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Persona 4 was changed by 70.188.24.125 (c) (t) blanking the page on 2007-09-22T22:24:20+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot 02:24, 23 September 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Page Blanking

Don't blank pages. --Serph 00:15, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Persona 3

Please keep in mind that what I'm saying is true. There is some very controversial content in FES that would definitely get edited were it to come to the U.S. Bokan 05:53, 29 September 2007 (UTC)Bokan

But its not confirmed that it will get edited out...in fact, NOTHING has been said. So don't make your own conclusions.

I'm not making my own conclusions, a lot of people agree on this actually. Bokan 20:00, 29 September 2007 (UTC)Bokan

Dude...BULLSHIT. Alot of people agreeing, ain't Atlus USA agreeing.

No need to swear. Anyway, I know what's in FES and I know that "it" will be censored. Atlus U.S.A. would think so too because it is highly inappropriate. Bokan 20:38, 29 September 2007 (UTC)Bokan

No, you DON'T know, no matter how inappropriate. I think the last, uh, say, FIVE or so games say so... Basically, they might, they might not. Don't use your own "past experience" to judge so, unless you're Atlus USA staff. >.>

Wow, you have a pretty lousy attitude about this. I'm through trying to explain this to you. Bokan 20:23, 30 September 2007 (UTC)Bokan

Tch, don't bother trying to explain it to anyone without concrete evidence...

And don't bother trying to rule wikipedia, it doesn't belong to only you. Bokan 03:25, 1 October 2007 (UTC)Bokan

I'm just trying to weed out the bullshit, is all...

Who's to say what you put down isn't bullshit either? That's a very poor attitude to have here. Bokan 06:14, 1 October 2007 (UTC)Bokan

Because I didn't put anything down...smart one.

I can see from the above comments that you aren't exactly very loved here. Work on your courtesy before addressing others in negative tones, especially to people who have newly joined. Bokan 20:29, 1 October 2007 (UTC)Bokan

True, but at least I manage to get the point across. Well, at least you're being cool about it, and not running with your tail between your legs like the others after I proved them wrong.

Arrogance isn't a charming quality, keep that in mind. Wikipedia is meant for everyone to use and if they have information they can prove, it doesn't mean you can erase it and start a trolling war with them. Do try to keep that in mind. Bokan 04:26, 2 October 2007 (UTC)Bokan

And this is the part when you lose that cool quality and become like every other jackass. Nice one.

It's like dealing with a child. Good luck growing up then, you've got a lot of it to do. Bokan 23:28, 2 October 2007 (UTC)Bokan

[edit] Your recent edits

Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button Image:Wikisigbutton.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 03:44, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] October 2007

Please do not attack other editors, which you did here: User_talk:70.188.24.125. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Bfigura (talk) 01:46, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] Your recent edits

Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button Image:Wikisigbutton.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 19:36, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re:Regarding the KH Games

Those particular statements and citations that have been remove were taken from the GameSpot article TGS '07: Three new Kingdom Hearts games coming. The article stated: "Although the three titles are so far only confirmed for release in Japan, the company assures its Western fans of the series that 'release in other territories will be determined at a later date.'" The content added in by this source is within the rules and guidelines of Wikipedia. So please, let's not go back and forth on this matter. (Guyinblack25 talk 22:36, 5 October 2007 (UTC))

Thats all nice and well, but since when has GameSpot been a reliable source? Sorry.

Three things that I would like to state because I getting the feeling, and I honestly mean no offense by these, that you are somewhat new to Wikipedia.
  1. We're suppose to discuss this before action is taken. By asserting your position and then acting before others respond, you're bypassing the whole purpose of talk pages and the cooperative nature of an open wiki.
  2. GameSpot and several other gaming website are considered reliable sources by the Video games Project according to Portal:Video_games/Sources.
  3. One of the more important points is that there is other content that use that same source as a citation. Deleting that source breaks the reference for the other citations.
Look, let's discuss this out before we go back and forth undoing each other's edits. Talking things out is meant to prevent edit wars.(Guyinblack25 talk 03:32, 7 October 2007 (UTC))

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kingdom Hearts Birth by Sleep. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits.
I'm sorry you disagree with the guidelines of the Videogame Project, however this is not the way to handle this. Instead of taking action that could lead to your IP being blocked, I suggest you start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games. (Guyinblack25 talk 19:49, 11 October 2007 (UTC))

[edit] Warning

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. However, please know that editors do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, know that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 07:26, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Off on the wrong foot

Hey, I feel that we've gotten off on the wrong foot. It is obvious that you are passionate about certain topics/articles on Wikipedia. You want them to be of good quality and factual. That is admirable and I respect that. Wikipedia needs more people that care about the content of the articles and are willing to try and enforce that quality. If I or others have offended you with our comments and/or actions, I'm sorry for that. But I, and I'm sure others, still stand by our decisions. We were only doing what we felt was the correct thing to do for the articles, just as I believe you were trying to do. I think the only real difference is that we're more familiar with the guidelines to Wikipedia because we've been around longer and have all had our share breaking those guidelines in good faith.

Regardless, I hope you will continue to edit on Wikipedia and perhaps even get a user account. Like I said, I'm sure you have something offer. Maybe that something is a tightening of guidelines and policies to improve the quality of the articles. Maybe it's just improving articles you're interested in like the rest of us. Anyway, I hope we can move past our previous disputes and try to work together on these articles because in the end it looks like we both want the same thing. Good quality articles. Have a nice day. (Guyinblack25 talk 18:39, 12 October 2007 (UTC))

[edit] Your recent edits

Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button Image:Wikisigbutton.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 22:48, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button Image:Wikisigbutton.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 11:54, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Video game sources

I thought you might want to know that there is currently a proposed guideline for the use of sources for the VG Project. The discussion can be found here. And I hope you don't mind some unsolicited advice, but as silly as this sounds I'd also recommend getting a user account before you discuss there. Anonymous IP addresses are sadly sometimes not taken seriously. Anyway, I thought you might like the chance to express your views about the subject. (Guyinblack25 talk 14:34, 25 October 2007 (UTC))

[edit] Sock

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abusive use of sockpuppets; inappropriate edits. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

You have a fetish for vulnerable, barefooted women. Goody for you. Wikipedia does not want to be a part of your sex life. Stop adding your particular fetish to articles. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 15:08, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Block extended indefinitely. -- But|seriously|folks  16:39, 27 October 2007 (UTC)