User talk:70.182.219.158

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Go ahead and make just one more personal attack, or one more change to the NAMBLA page without first discussing it -- and see how quickly I have your IP blocked indefinitely from posting on Wikipedia. Corax 22:05, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

Please stop targeting one or more user's pages or talk pages for abuse or insults, unwarranted doctoring or blanking. It can be seen as vandalism and may get you blocked from editing Wikipedia.

{{unblock}} Can I get some examples please?


Contents

[edit] Warning

Please stop blanking pages and posting personal insults. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. AnnH (talk) 18:47, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

Sorry, 70..., I hadn't been considering that possibility. Thanks for your positive reply - one does not get that very often nowadays. Str1977 00:13, 3 December 2005 (UTC)


[edit] Harassment Block

Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for a period of time. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock}} on this page, along with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username and IP address in your email.

Do not erase this page or any of the warnings on it. Doing so is also considered vandalism.

Sycthos 03:03, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] tampering with Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct

Please do not remove other people's comments from the Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct page. Owen× ☎ 23:03, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Personal attacks

An editor using this IP address has made some personal attacks like this and this against other editors. You can get your points across while remaining civil, and I encourage you to engage in a civil rather than rude manner--it's more effective, and will be less likely to result in your being blocked from editing Wikipedia. Demi T/C 23:14, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] resolving the dispute

What is it you want? What exact problems do you want addressed with Corax and the others? Wikipedia accepts any constructive editor who provides useful edits regardless of his or her views. Why do you think these users happen to be soapboxing, and how can we resolve this? Clearly, all users certainly has a right to their opinion, if it is not disruptive, and can be stated if it is of contributive merit to the project. I don't exactly get what behaviour you contest here, can you clear it up? -- Natalinasmpf 23:46, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

His edits, aren't constructive, every edict he makes is to try and make pedophilia an exceptable behavior. He is a selfconfessed "child-love activist", who is using wikipedia to promote his view point, not adding to the usefull resource i believe wikipedia to be.

Hmm...let's try to resolve this more specifically. How does are his contributions not constructive? He has contributed what appears to be legitimate information to several articles. Are you contesting its neutrality? If so, how are such edits non-neutral? Our current neutral point of view policy means that views are to be reported on neutrally based on their significance, although any criticisms to a controversial stance is likely to be given. It is possible that some promotion of viewpoint is occurring, but perhaps this is a case of correcting misrepresentation, as long as this reflects NPOV? I am sorry for the block, but let us resolve this dispute peacefully please. -- Natalinasmpf 00:38, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

I have blocked this IP address for repeated personal attacks such as this and incivility, after having been warned several times. When the block expires, you will probably need to answer a RFC. I urge you to do so in a civil manner. Demi T/C 00:26, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] NAMBLA page

It's just not constructive to keep on adding the category in. Be patient. Let the discussion work itself out. Contribute somewhere else. You seem to be here only to try to achieve a particular aim. Why not set yourself up a website to do that? Grace Note 03:39, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

Yes, of course I do. Disapproving of your edits is not approving of theirs. Please don't think it is. I'm not taking any side except that of the encyclopaedia. Grace Note 00:03, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked for vandalism

This account has been temporarily blocked for 24 hours for repeated vandalism. FreplySpang (talk) 23:44, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] What is this page?

This page is useless for an encyclopedia. Delete it.

[edit] Blocked as sockpuppet

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires.

As you are a sockpuppet of Karatekid7, the one week block you earned under that name has followed you here. As I stated before, please come back as a productive member of the community or not at all. Enjoy your wiki-vacation.Gator (talk) 18:12, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

As you've earned yourself an indefinate block with your sockpuppet, so shall that block follow you here.Gator (talk) 18:50, 21 March 2006 (UTC)