User talk:70.181.24.188

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

Here are some other hints and tips:

  • I would recommend that you get a username. You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and there are many benefits of having a username. (If you edit without a username, your IP address is used to identify you instead.)
  • When using talk pages, please sign your name at the end of your messages by typing four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username (or IP address) and the date.

If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my Talk page or you can type {{helpme}} on this talk page and a user will help you as soon as possible. I will answer your questions as far as I can. Again, welcome!

Thank you again for contributing to Wikipedia. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian. -- Steel 22:08, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] List of Dr. Eggman's vehicles

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article List of Dr. Eggman's vehicles, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 15:15, 22 January 2008 (

[edit] February 2008

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to User talk:Greg Jungwirth. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. · AndonicO Hail! 02:20, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Rhode Island Hero for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. treelo talk 02:25, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Answers from LDEJRuff

Yes, I'm gonna be an animator someday, and a cartoonist. Sorry treelo accused you of sockpuppetry as I was, but thanks for removing the suspected sockpuppetry tag off my page.
And I'll think about joining your club.
~~LDEJRuff~~ (talk) 17:42, 14 February 2008 (EDT)

Hi, the recent edit you made to User talk:Treelo has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Keilana|Parlez ici 21:15, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to User talk:Treelo constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Poeloq (talk) 21:26, 15 February 2008 (UTC))

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to User talk:Treelo. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Poeloq (talk) 21:28, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on User talk:Treelo. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. treelo talk 21:29, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] RE: SANDBOX

Hi! I'm not sure why you are replacing user talk pages with "C", but as you ask what a sandbox is, I presume you are willing to learn about Wikipedia :) Check WP:SANDBOX, you can edit here as much as you like without damaging anything. Have fun! Poeloq (talk) 21:31, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

-- Ed (Edgar181) 21:54, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Elaich, without explaining the reason for the removal in the edit summary. Unexplained removal of content does not appear constructive, and your edit has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Icestorm815 • Talk 22:19, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 48 hours as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. for continuing vandalism. — Rlevse • Talk • 12:58, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:DietLimeCola, without explaining the reason for the removal in the edit summary. Unexplained removal of content does not appear constructive, and your edit has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you. --Oxymoron83 00:58, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to User talk:DietLimeCola has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. J.delanoygabsadds 00:49, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to User talk:Treelo constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. J.delanoygabsadds 00:50, 6 March 2008 (UTC))

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. ChetblongT C 00:16, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to User talk:Treelo, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. PseudoOne 02:03, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Treelo, you will be blocked from editing. PseudoOne 02:06, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.


You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Antandrus (talk) 02:08, 14 March 2008 (UTC)