User talk:70.140.219.56

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions.

Currently, you are editing without a username. You can continue to do so, as you are not required to log in to Wikipedia to read and edit articles; however, logging in will result in a username being shown instead of your IP address (yours is 70.140.219.56). Logging in does not require any personal details, and there are many other benefits for logging in.

When you edit pages:

  • Please respect others' copyrights; do not copy and paste the contents from webpages directly.
  • Please use a neutral point of view when editing articles; this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
  • If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
  • Do not add unreasonable contents into any articles, such as copyrighted text, advertisement messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Adding such content or editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism.

The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. For now, if you are stuck, you can click the edit this page tab above, type {{helpme}} in the edit box, and then click Save Page; an experienced Wikipedian will be around shortly to answer any questions you may have. Also feel free to ask a question on my talk page. I will answer your questions as far as I can! Thank you again for contributing to Wikipedia. DietLimeCola 16:41, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] It's Double Dee

[1] —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.59.27.100 (talk) 04:58, 6 January 2007 (UTC).

[2] More proof. Search for Double Dee. If someone who works on the show calls him Double Dee, then it's Double dee. 69.59.27.100 05:05, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 3RR

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. ViridaeTalk 05:02, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

That was NOT vandalism related reverting, it was a content dispute so the warning is valid. I have just blocked the other IP for violation of 3RR, and if you make another revert you will go the same way. PLease try to discuss changes rather than continually reverting, it achieves nothing. ViridaeTalk 05:16, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

I did warn you...

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.

ViridaeTalk 05:18, 6 January 2007 (UTC)