User talk:70.115.3.154

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please stop vandalizing the "sweatpants" article. You may be blocked from future wikipedia edits/contributions if you continue. Hilmarc (talk) 12:51, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Sweatpants. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ERobson (talk) 03:59, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Sweatpants. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Calvin 1998 (t-c) 04:08, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

WP:OR, deriving from the first pillar. nneonneo talk 04:16, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Find a reliable source for it, then. nneonneo talk 04:23, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you make a personal attack, as you did with this edit to User talk:Calvin 1998. nneonneo talk 04:17, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. ¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 04:37, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.'

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I am being harrassed consantly and having my hard work reverted by overzealous RC patrollers. I have attemptd on numerous occasions to edit the article on sweatpants in order to include disadvantages as is customary with articles of clothing such as a hobble skirt I have referenced my statements to prove that they are made with great care and objectivity. As a fashion design major,I have made it my passion to increase clothing encyclopedic knowledge on wikipedia. All of my edits have been with this ultimate goal in mind. There is nothing vandalistic about my edits, and I feel I have expressed myself well when editing in order to inform others of the merits of my addition. In addition to being unblocked, I must request that the wikipedians who constantly harrassed and insulted me be suspended until they can prove their merits including but not limited to a highschool level or equivalent education and a capacity for rational thought."

Decline reason: "You were clearly repeatedly returning information of dubious relevence to the article. That you did this over and over again, despite repeated warnings to stop, is the problem. I am inclined to leave this block in place, given that you clearly violated the three revert rule, especially since there appears to be a widespread consensus against that edit. — Jayron32.talk.contribs 05:41, 22 May 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Additionally, you made several unwarrented personal attacks against other users. That will NOT be tolerated. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 05:43, 22 May 2008 (UTC)