User talk:70.113.76.108

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] May 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Jupiter, you will be blocked from editing. —Gaff ταλκ 04:06, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] June 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Burj Dubai, you will be blocked from editing. --Mhking 17:54, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] August 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Larry Bird. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sam42 19:38, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Joe Paterno, you will be blocked from editing. Billma 00:19, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please read Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, which all articles must follow. This is especially a concern at Greg Maddux. Wikipedia is a neutral, verifiable encyclopedia; it is not a place to argue a particular point of view. Thank you. --ShadowJester07 ► Talk 20:59, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
Your continued joking is disruptive and considered vandalism, and you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia without another warning if you continue. Cheers, Corvus coronoides talk 21:20, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Maddux

Thank you for your recent contributions to Wikipedia. While the Wikipedia community appreciates your obvious efforts to increase the amount of information on the site, unfortunately we cannot accept content which appears to be the original work of the editor who submitted it. If the material you added can be attributed to a reliable source, you may add it back if you cite your source. This increases the reputation of Wikipedia as a whole and aids in verifying the contents of the article.

Please see the Reference generator.

Thanks! --ShadowJester07 ► Talk 22:03, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Joe Paterno, you will be blocked from editing. Billma 01:05, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to University of Michigan, are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Phydend 01:37, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ZimZalaBim talk 02:15, 15 August 2007 (UTC)


You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Kubigula (talk) 21:53, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 3RR

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on University of Michigan. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. — TKD::Talk 18:12, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

The same goes for your activity at University of Notre Dame. Please heed WP:3RR. --ZimZalaBim talk 02:35, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] University of Michigan

Stop changing the reference about the fight song. There is a reference there where Sousa said it was the best song. That is one source. Add to the Notre Dame Fight Song page your reference. People have different opinions and they are talked about in the articles. Your addition, calling The Victors the second best song is against wikipedia's policy on NPOV and misleading. You've been blocked before for deliberately adding misleading information, and if you aren't careful and add actual citations (see WP:CITE for help) for your additions it will probably happen again. Phydend 18:16, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] University of Notre Dame

As mentioned above, you are approaching a violation of WP:3RR in this article. Please cease your insertion of incorrect information, information copied from existing wikipedia articles, and other disruptive edits. Thank you. --ZimZalaBim talk 03:07, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Warning

Your body of work which includes 3RR violations, the inclusion of unsourced factual errors and POV edits may result in you being blocked for a time if you continue. -- No Guru 03:42, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced defamatory content into an article, as you did to Vida Blue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- No Guru 03:50, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our polices concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. -- No Guru 04:11, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Joe Paterno. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Billma 21:04, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] August 26, 2007

Regarding this edit summary [1], please assume good faith and leave personal commentary out of your edit summaries. Take the dispute to the talk page. --ZimZalaBim talk 17:18, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

I would also like to point out that you since you appear to be coming off a 1-week block for "POV edits with false sourcing, edit warring, 3RR and vandalism", if you continue with such actions, you will likely be blocked again. Please take care when editing. Thanks. --ZimZalaBim talk 17:22, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
Similar to the above, the recent edits to Joe Montana (which you made under another username) are not appropriate. You have not provided proper sources and even if you do, the name was not widely used beyond his career at Notre Dame (assuming your statements are true). Juan Miguel Fangio| ►Chat  18:01, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User:Jmfangio/to do, you will be blocked from editing. ZimZalaBim talk 01:52, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 1 week block

This IP address has been blocked from editing for one week due to edit warring. DurovaCharge! 04:21, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Immediately upon expiration of your block you are reverting to the same insertions of unsourced material. Please stop immediately, or a new block will be enforced. Thanks. --ZimZalaBim talk 18:39, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 1 year block

This IP address has been blocked from editing for one year for chronic disruption and abusive sockpuppetry including the Jimfandango impersonation account. DurovaCharge! 18:47, 8 September 2007 (UTC)