User talk:70.109.54.8

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

An editor has expressed a concern that this user may be a sock puppet of 12.150.11.25.
Please refer to editing habits and/or contributions; this policy subsection may also be helpful.

Account information: block log – current autoblocks – edits – logs

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions.

Currently, you are editing without a username. You can continue to do so, as you are not required to log in to Wikipedia to read and edit articles; however, logging in will result in a username being shown instead of your IP address (yours is 70.109.54.8). Logging in does not require any personal details. There are many other benefits for logging in to Wikipedia. For now, if you are stuck, you can type {{helpme}} on this page and an experienced Wikipedian will be around to answer any questions you may have.

Please note these points:

The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, ask me on my Talk page. I will answer your questions as far as I can! Thank you again for contributing to Wikipedia. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 04:24, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 04:25, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. — Signaturebrendel 17:37, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule on Dealey Plaza. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. ··coelacan 00:45, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Here's the Deal

You appear to have some beef with McAdams, which I don't really care about, but I nor other editors will not let you removed properly sourced material due to this beef. Please note that editors have engaged all of your contentions, yet you repeatedly ignore what you are being told, and stubbornly go on doing exactly what is getting you blocked, and articles locked. This is why I have accused you of trolling. For example, you have been repeatedly told to stop signing your posts with "CWC" as it is the name of another user. You have been repeatedly told that McAdams makes up very few of the citations of the articles told. You have been repeatedly told that even if every cite was to McAdams, it would be proper under WP:RS (which you obviously have not taken the time to even check). You have continuously edit warred over several days on several articles after being told not to. Contrary to your assertions, you have not come up with ONE reliable source (or any sources of any kind) regarding your theories. The rules apply to everyone including you "RPJ". Ramsquire (throw me a line) 00:20, 7 June 2007 (UTC)


I told you, I don't care about the content of the articles. It doesn't do any good to complain to me about what's wrong with the articles. You need dispute resolution, and to do that you should probably register an account. To answer your question, as it's a pretty simple one, consensus can come about if you actually stop unilaterally introducing your desired changes and instead use the article talk pages to propose compromise versions. That's what the talk pages are there for. When an article is protected, you're supposed to work toward a compromise instead of moving on to another article and starting a new fight there. Hopping from article to article and starting new fights just makes you look like a troll or a fanatic. If you're a troll, you will probably have more fun trolling webforums where people tolerate more ranting than we do here. If you're a fanatic, well, we actually have some good advice on how to not be a fanatic and get some of the changes you want accomplished. I hope you'll take that advice. ··coelacan 06:53, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Edit war at Lee Harvey Oswald

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. --Chaser - T 03:19, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for disrupting Wikipedia by making personal attacks. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. Gamaliel (Orwellian Cyber hell master) 15:10, 21 June 2007 (UTC)