User talk:70.108.103.64

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This host, pool-70-108-103-64.res.east.verizon.net, is registered to Verizon Internet Services, an Internet service provider through which numerous individual users may connect to the Internet via proxy. This IP address may be reassigned to a different person when the current user disconnects.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism, in which case, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.


Contents

[edit] Cassie

I posted a direct quote from WP:BLP that says unsourced/contested content should be "removed immediately" from talk pages as well as articles. Why are you still questioning this? Also, the Feb. version you keep reverting to actually has more stuff censored than the version I made yesterday, where I also "signed" unsigned comments so the redacted content can be easily found in the edit history. —Hello, Control Hello, Tony 16:57, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked User

You are a blocked user. Your block from yesterday has not expired. You aren't permitted to edit anything on this page or on the Cassie talk page at all. That's why I undo your edits.Kww (talk) 17:04, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] WP:BLP

You asked for help on this. One of the first lines of WP:BLP states;

Editors must take particular care adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page.

Note the emphasis on any. I don't know the content of the removed material, but if it fails WP:BLP, it shouldn't be on a talk page the same as it shouldn't be on an article page. --Escape Orbit (Talk) 17:08, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Thank You. The content doesnt fail. The contest was various things: [redacted] info on her risque oral sex inuendo music vid ( she did ). So why is sensoring this true info allowed? 70.108.103.64 (talk) 17:16, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Another comment from the very top of WP:BLP -- some emphasis added
"Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons — whether the material is negative, positive, or just questionable — should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion, from Wikipedia articles, talk pages, user pages, and project space."
There you go. It says to remove them, even from talk pages, without discussion. If you want to discuss replacing them, I don't see that being a problem...but if there are valid BLP concerns, you're going to need sources just to talk about them. --Onorem♠Dil 17:11, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
The content does fail—it is unsourced and contested. If you can find a verifiable reference from a reliable source then it can be replaced. By the way, you have no idea what that word mean, apparently. —Hello, Control Hello, Tony 17:19, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard, without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. TRAVELLINGCARIMy storyTell me yours 17:11, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for edit warring and disruption. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Hersfold (t/a/c) 17:26, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Soubrette

It has nothing to do with the quality of someone's singing voice. You really should learn the definition of words before you use them. —Hello, Control Hello, Tony 17:30, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

[1]
This looks like a personal attack to me: "You really should learn the definition of words before you use them" .

So incivility is allowed? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.108.133.81 (talk) 18:08, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

It is a statement of fact. You are repeatedly using a word that you think means something it doesn't. If I am mistaken, please supply a verifiable reference from a reliable source showing your definition of the word.