User talk:70.106.114.18

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please. Regarding the Personal branding article, it would be far more productive to discuss your suggested additions on the article's talk page rather than have your edits continually reverted. RJASE1 Talk 04:19, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Your edit to Personal branding

Your recent edit to Personal branding (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 14:09, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] come to the talkpage

Why don't you come to the talkpage and explain why you feel the sections you are trying to add should be included - I'm afraid the site you are trying to add will have to be added to the spam blacklist if you persist. --Fredrick day 14:15, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edits to personal branding

There are several reasons why self published sources are not acceptable sources. I've tried to point you to the relevant pages several times now, please read them. If the video or book or article that you want to use as sources for the article have been published by an actual publisher, perhaps we can use them. Right now, we can't. Please stop trying to insert references to your website into the article, as you risk getting blocked again! --JoanneB 14:52, 8 April 2007 (UTC)


[edit] April 2007

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Personal branding; this is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. MER-C 12:39, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, please ignore this warning.


Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policy for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Thank you.-- JoanneB 17:49, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] back again

Forget it - people have articles on their watchlists, so if you make a change, it pops up. So no waiting a week is not going to help. --Fredrick day 16:44, 15 April 2007 (UTC)


Reference 2 is a peer-reviewed source and therefore is acceptable as per WP:RS. In addition, if you are the owner of http://www.brandicapped.com/ (as seems to be the case), the normal practice to suggest links to your own site on the talkpage of an article - this is to avoid conflicts of interest. --Fredrick day 16:55, 15 April 2007 (UTC)