User talk:69.91.124.186

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

Here are some other hints and tips:

  • I would recommend that you get a username. You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and there are many benefits of having a username. (If you edit without a username, your IP address is used to identify you instead.)
  • When using talk pages, please sign your name at the end of your messages by typing four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username (or IP address) and the date.

Don't worry too much about being perfect. Very few of us are! Just in case you are not perfect, click here to see how you can avoid making common mistakes.

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Wikipedians try to follow a strict policy of never biting new users. If you are unsure of how to do something, you are welcome to ask a more experienced user such as an administrator. One last bit of advice: please sign any discussion comment with four tildes (~~~~). The software will automatically convert this into your signature which can be altered in the "Preferences" tab at the top of the screen. I hope I have not overwhelmed you with information. If you need any help just let me know. Once again welcome to Wikipedia, and don't forget to tell us about yourself and be BOLD! — coelacan talk — 08:42, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Licensing

We can't use non-commercial licensing here, although I know that considering the nature of Wikipedia that might surprise you. The reason is that we use the GFDL here and it requires that contributed information be allowed to be reused for any purpose, including commercial purposes. Another stipulation of the GFDL is that when you add content to Wikipedia, you have to release it under the GFDL, and in order to do that you must hold the copyright to it, or it must already be released under the GFDL by the copyright holder. So that's why all additions here have to be your own work, your own writing, so that you hold the copyright and can legally release it under the GFDL. I'm probably being rather confusing right now, so after you read the GFDL article, if you have questions, drop by my talk page. — coelacan talk — 08:42, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] An Automated Message from HagermanBot

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button Image:Wikisigbutton.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 02:34, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edits to Zhang Jigang

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, 69.91.124.186! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but please note that the link you added in is on my spam blacklist and should not be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an Imageshack or Photobucket image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was genuine spam, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 00:02, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Simulated reality, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ Walkie-talkie 22:02, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Technorati

Criticisim of Technorati belongs in the Technorati article. Nowhere else. AlistairMcMillan 22:50, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Spamming your comments across multiple articles and multiple Talk pages doesn't help your argument. It just makes you seem less reasonable and makes the content you wanted added less likely to be included. Please limit your criticism of Technorati to the Technorati article and the Technorati Talk page. AlistairMcMillan 22:02, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
Last warning. Spam discussions across multiple talk pages like that once more and I'll block you. AlistairMcMillan 04:06, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Please read Wikipedia:Attribution. In short: "All material in Wikipedia must be attributable to a reliable, published source." AlistairMcMillan 19:00, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

You've been blocked for 24 hours for vandalism to the Technorati article. AlistairMcMillan 15:53, 24 March 2007 (UTC)


[edit] 16 nanometer

Your edit looks like speculation. You have 24 hours to produce a reliable source that backs up your edit to 16 nanometer. Please read our policy WP:ATT. Specifically "The burden of evidence lies with the editor wishing to add or retain the material." AlistairMcMillan 22:07, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

You need to read through the articles written on the other technology nodes. It's a two year cycle. Whoever wrote the 16 nm article paid no attention to this fact. It's the cycle of the industry. You can spend time trying to find a quote or an article stating the obvious. If you're lazy you can reference the other technology node articles which assume it. However, I don't think any of the other articles on the other nodes cite to a source when referencing the two year cycle.
Just to point out how silly it would be... the 22 nm node is projected to occur in 2011 and then the industry stops with the two year cycle and it takes seven years? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.91.124.186 (talk • contribs) 02:48, March 28, 2007
Please read our policy: WP:ATT. Note the part that says: "Editors should provide attribution for quotations and for any material that is challenged or likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. The burden of evidence lies with the editor wishing to add or retain the material." AlistairMcMillan 00:09, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Mark Burnett

Not sure what problem you are having. If you click on the link in the references section what happens? I just tried it and it works for me.

Please be careful with your edits. Stillman claimed that the show was "manipulated" by Burnett, Been was asked if he was manipulated and he clearly said "...I didn't feel like I was manipulated." Its in the deposition you linked to.

Do you know how these cases ended up? All I could find was that on appeal the original decision in the SEG v Stillman case was "affirmed" on May 22, 2003. No idea what the original decision was, or who lodged the appeal. AlistairMcMillan 06:23, 31 March 2007 (UTC)


[edit] May 2007

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Technorati, you will be blocked from editing. Y4kk 22:58, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.