User talk:69.65.75.26

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] April 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Tibetan people (Evidence: [1]). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.Angelo De La Paz (talk) 13:02, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Tibetan people (Evidence: [2]). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.Angelo De La Paz (talk) 13:02, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Tibetan people. Angelo De La Paz (talk) 15:28, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Tibetan people. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Angelo De La Paz (talk) 15:30, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

-- Ed (Edgar181) 15:40, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Several NPOV, bias, and factual errors with the article in question. Removal of unverified material and conflicting information is regarded by Free Tibet Hippies as vandalism. This is not so, and temporary ban is not warranted.