User talk:69.50.160.154

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. --Nlu (talk) 17:36, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] December 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to John Pope (alderman), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: John Pope (alderman) was changed by 69.50.160.154 (c) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2007-12-03T16:29:38+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot 16:29, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to System of a Down. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Bongwarrior (talk) 07:28, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Dear People. "I" am using an evidently shared IP address to make edits to Brahmo and Brahmo Samaj in March 2008. "I" am not associated with the above vandalisms. I cannot create a user ID for this because I am located near Riyadh in KSA and local situations. 69.50.160.154 (talk) 15:01, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Your recent edit to Brahmo Samaj (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. Please do not add email addresses/phone numbers, Imageshack/Photobucket/Flickr, or related links to non-talk pages if possible. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II (talk) 10:07, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Dear VoABot or other Human Editors. I have reviewed the edits undone. I cannot find where emailaddresses, phone numbers, Imageshack, Flickr, Photobucket or any other external links etc have been added by me. I (a human) am cautiously attempting to carry out User:Paul_Barlow's suggestion to "merge" 2 pages Brahmo and Brahmo Samaj. I shall await human intervention, either by Users or Administrators. I do not consider myself to be a Vandal but admit I could be unknowingly doing something wrong which should be clearly specified. I assure to scrupulously adhere to 3RR. Bikash. 69.50.160.154 (talk) 10:19, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Lisa del Giocondo has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. κaτaʟavenoTC 01:28, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

The above editor is not I who is editing pages about Bengal Renaissance and Brahmo Samaj. I condemn this other user's filthy language. (Bikash Sen)

[edit] Adi Dharm

Hello. I notice that you have removed a lot of content from the article. I also note that, like you claim, the article reads strongly POV. I do hope you will restore content OR change the tone appropriately. Thank you! Prashanthns (talk) 15:19, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

But, if you feel most of the edits are ok, I suggest you restore sections of the article. Just waiting for the other user will not do. Thanks for understanding. Prashanthns (talk) 15:58, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
You cannot do this in Wikepedea. I have undone your deletes of mine edits. Shall be adding refernces. What partions you do have probleme with ?Lillycottage (talk) 16:26, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Your recent edit to Scrotum (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! (Report bot mistakes here) // VoABot II (talk) 01:44, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Scrotum. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NeilN talk ♦ contribs 01:51, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to Scrotum.
Any further vandalism will result in you being blocked from editing Wikipedia. NeilN talk ♦ contribs 01:55, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
If you continue to make personal attacks on other people as you did at User talk:69.50.160.154, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Kesac (talk) 00:37, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy due to persistent vandalism originating from your proxy server or network. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Alex.Muller 00:38, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

An abuse report will be sent to your Internet service provider for investigation Alex.Muller 00:39, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Kuru. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Aleenf1 07:13, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

You have been Blocked for Disruptive editing and harassment. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires.--Hu12 (talk) 07:18, 21 May 2008 (UTC)