User talk:69.255.74.235

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] February 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Sunshine (2007 film) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Tuvok[T@lk/Improve] 06:12, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Sunshine (2007 film), is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. This applies to all Wikipedia articles. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add your reference to the article. I would also recommend reading Wikipedia's policy on original research. Thank you. Steve TC 08:27, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] Sunshine (2007 film)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Sunshine (2007 film). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Owen× 01:43, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Please read WP:MOSFILM#Plot for writing the Plot section of a film article. A certain length is reasonable to give an idea of the events that take place in the film in the general sense so the real-world context of the article makes sense. —Erik (talkcontrib) - 01:45, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
You'll have to excuse me; I was not trying to dominate that particular section. I made a judgment call about the additional detail because it seemed to be more words to get the same point across about Pinbacker's actions. I had the mindset of reducing the word count and keeping it decreased instead of going the other way. Admittedly, it's not easy to determine exactly what to describe from the film. I tried to be as "overall" as possible with the film's events so a reader can get a general idea of the film's process from beginning to end. How about we have discussion on the film article's talk page to tweak any details that may seem important to mention in the context of the article? —Erik (talkcontrib) - 02:09, 9 February 2008 (UTC)