User talk:69.249.191.221

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I have removed your trivia section addition made to Pat Burrell, in line with WP:TRIV; If you think the information relevant, please intergrate it into the article. Thank you. Neobros 10:26, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your recent edits

Please read WP:BLP before adding controversal information within articles. You might also wish to read WP:SYNTH when including information which is only partially related to the subject, like you did with Inglis. Arzel 23:10, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Additionally, you should read WP:RS before inserting information into articles, as you did with FNC. Blogs are not considered reliable sources within wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a dumping ground for gossip. Arzel 16:53, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

WP:OR is not allowed in articles, as you did with the Beltway Boys. Arzel (talk) 15:06, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] FINAL NOTICE

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Michael Medved, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ward3001 (talk) 23:49, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

"My claim that Medved is sympathetic toward the Confederacy is not defamatory": It is defamatory if you don't cite a source. See WP:BLP.
"it is sourced, as I referenced a movie review he gave": Mentioning the review is very inadequate as a method of sourcing. Give the specific information about the publication (name, date, issue number, etc.) or website (specific URL). See WP:CITE for ways to cite sources.
You have been warned repeatedly. That's why I gave you a final warning. Editors are held to a higher standard for biographies of living persons because Wikipedia is subject to lawsuit for libel and slander. But you didn't even meet the minimum citation standards for any article, much less a biography. Ward3001 (talk) 18:16, 16 January 2008 (UTC)