User talk:69.244.181.184

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] December 2007

With regard to your comments on Bill O'Reilly (commentator): Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. -- ALLSTARecho 10:53, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Only Warning

This is your only warning.
The next time you make a personal attack, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. /Blaxthos ( t / c ) 19:49, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] ANI report

RYNORT: I've reported your conduct to WP:ANI. Disucssion may be found here. /Blaxthos ( t / c ) 19:46, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

--65.31.55.44 (talk) 01:37, 28 January 2008 (UTC)=Waiting for an APOLOGY from Admin Blaxthos=

Despite your urgent warnings on YOUR talkpage that people ALWAYS assume good faith, you SLANDERED AND SMEARED both my editing and reputation by having me banned under the pretense that I was some other user - Rynort.

Guess what? I'm not.

Now apologize.

I would also like you to resign from wikipedia.

Your gross error in judgment, false & slanderous charges and rash EXPLOITATION of whatever authority you may have been empowered with is evidence enough that you have disqualified YOURSELF to serve as a Wikipedia admin any longer. Thank you.

PS You said 'no one was fooled.' But apparently, you were. You have evidence that I am Rynort? Put up or...resign. It's really simple.

C'mon, man. You get to choose.... 69.244.181.184 (talk) 22:02, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

You really think anyone is going to care if you resign? John Reaves 22:24, 10 January 2008 (UTC)


at lest we let black people into our party, and at least we will hold debates and give speeches to black organizations. and thanks for cussing at me. That is very Christian of you. God Bless :)--65.31.55.44 (talk) 23:58, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, we know you 'let' black people into your party. So you can tell everyone how they Shuck and Jive (NY ATTY General Cuomo) and need the white man to do the hard labor (MLK needed LBJ per Hillary.)

And of course you never let Black people have IMPORTANT positions (See Clarence Thomas, Rod Paige and Condi Rice for details) LOL!

Nice little RACE WAR you have going on in your party. Very impressed. Too bad it's irreparably DESTROYED any chances you have of winning the presidency...again! Oh well, you can always delude yourself that we 'stole' it...again!

LOL!

Ps To a Nazi facist like you, the very word 'Christian' is a swear word. So I guess I was just trying to speak in the language that you (and your Führer) would understand.

LOL!!! 69.244.181.184 (talk) 00:17, 28 January 2008 (UTC)


Interesting you call me a Nazi facist. Nazi's and facists are right wing groups (despit what rush limbaugh tells you) Nazis are right wing, so are facists. Communists are left wing equivalent, sister. Yes I realize that the names is National Socialist German Workers party, but every party in europe had socialist and worker in their party names (I have a masters in 20th century european history). Basically Europe was heavily influenced by socialism after WWI and to get anyone to vote for you, you have to had to have the socialist workers thing in your name. The left wing party in Europe could be the democratic socialist workers party and the right wing party would be called the Workers socialist democrat party. So don’t rely do much on names. In my experience if you have to announce what you are in the name, you probably aren’t that (peoples republic of china aint exactly a peoples republic, dig?) but anyway stay away from the Nazi thing, it just diminishes your argument, with the name calling and all (plus it is historically incorrect and a bit childish) also I remember something about judge not less ye be judged. Anyway, you are also incorrect on the Christian being a swear word for me. I am actually a United Methodist and have been since birth, very active in my church. So again, please don’t infer that I hate Jesus or something. Look I am more concerned with helping the poor, ending wars, fighting for social justice, and other things that Christ taught then I am with fighting stem cell research or gay marriage. It seems to me that the only way to be a Christian in this country (without being called a nazi by people like you) is to only be concerned with gays and abortions. There are other Christian issues (as I mentioned earlier) that I devote me time to, so please don’t call me a Nazi because I devote me time to different issues.

You seem very angry, I would advise turning off Rush and start working with people to make a change, maybe people you don’t agree with, so that you aren’t just polarizing America and keeping us in this rut of division that we seem to be stuck in. Even if you don’t like the political left, I would strongly advise approaching them in a sensible and Christian like manner, after all Jesus sat at the table with those who were sinners, he did not accuse them of worshiping adolf Hitler. Thanks again and God Bless you. I hope, through prayer, you can calm down some of that anger in your heart. --65.31.55.44 (talk) 01:40, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Well Girlfriend...

The FIRST thing you need to do is get saved. After that, you can post an apology for PRETENDING to be a Christian. I can spot the FAKE ones (like you!) a mile away.

Your hatred of Jesus, and all that is good, combined with your love of socialist groups like the Nazis and Communists (and whatever else your Messiah Keith Olbermann tells you to worship) are easy giveaways.

Once you have Jesus in your heart, you can begin the long, painful and arduous process of ridding your corrupt rotten core of all the hatred accumulated through (my guestimate) 59 years (lol!) of life. In fact, for some people, it can be instananeous! Let's pray for a miracle for you! :)

Here's a song that may help explain this process:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wwJEdo1FlMo

Upload it to your Ipod inbetween your megadeath and Vanilla Ice mp3's.

I know it seems impossible now, but trust me - ANYONE can be delivered from liberalism. Trust God to make you a new creature. It begins inside and ultimately seeps out to correct your misguided judgement.

It is a process, so be patient.

In the interim, use your spare time to repent of your hateful/divisive/ill-informed ways.

I wish you well Mr/Mrs. Fake Christian/REAL liberal. 69.244.181.184 (talk) 08:16, 2 February 2008 (UTC)


Thanks I love you too. I'd love to talk more but I need to listen to Paul Harvey, seeing as how I'm 59 and all. Plus i love closer to the Creation Museum than you. So that makes me a better Fundamentalist Christian than you.--65.31.55.44 (talk) 16:59, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

How do you know where I live? I hope you're not a GAY stalker. Besides, since you are a REAL Christian, why aren't you at the Hillary Clinton for President Rally in LA this afternoon? lol 19:51, 2 February 2008 (UTC)


I am not going to LA because I am thinking about how the LIBERAL john McCain is going to be the Republican Nominee. P.S. I am from cincy so i assume i live close to the place. --65.31.55.44 (talk) 20:33, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

I think you would be better served by someone slightly more saner than yourself. Perhaps some Ron Paul supporters would be able to guide you in that regard! LOL!!! Love - The XXConservativeXX wikipeditor69.244.181.184 (talk) 22:53, 2 February 2008 (UTC)


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:69.244.181.184. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Thedjatclubrock :) (T/C) 22:53, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Karl Rove

Yeah! You tell him thejatclubrock!! BTW, since I have been unfairly and illegitimately banned from editing Wikipedia, how about you edit the Karl Rove HIT piece aka Wikipedia article.

For the longest time, the liberal editors that CONTROL wik have FALSELY accused Rove/Bush of being behind the McCain black baby push polls in SCarolina in 2000. They have no proof other than the ONLY proof liberals need which is their INSANE IRRATIONAL hatred of Karl Rove. Even this article proves that NO ONE has been proven to be behind the calls: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/us_elections/article3295472.ece

The left wing loonys that CONTROL wik have tried to use Bush's Brain as their source. Which is prima facie laughable. It's like using FreeRepublic as a source for the Hillary Clinton article.

So, please ELIMINATE all suggestions that Karl Rove or our GREAT PRESIDENT Bush (elected to two terms and NOT impeached unlike your guy Clinton - kinda stings, huh? lol!) had NOTHING to do with this until you can PROVE it which you can't. Thx 69.244.181.184 (talk) 01:40, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Hillary Clinton are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Onorem♠Dil 02:53, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Your mini-rant had nothing to do with improving the article. If you have any specific concerns, feel free to bring them up on the talk page. I have no interest in the article or any debate over the NPOV, or lack thereof. That a cop died because he couldn't keep his motorcycle off a curb is extremely unfortunate, and I feel for his family and friends, but it really has no place in the article. --Onorem♠Dil 03:05, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Talk:Bill O'Reilly (commentator) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 06:37, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Hillary Clinton article

I had a feeling I overrated you. It's typical of liberals who RUN wikipedia to start out saccharine sweet only to reveal their true colors as time goes on. I'm glad you cut to the chase quickly and saved us both alot of time.

Calling my HELPFUL suggestion a 'min-rant' is in violation of Wikipedia policies. It is NOT assuming good faith. It is NOT being nice and it clearly is an insult and cheap shot.

Please apologize both here and on my talk page for your spurious, insulting and inflammatory tone and accusation.

Thank you69.244.181.184 (talk) 06:15, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Only it wasn't helpful, and suggesting that the accidents were the fault of the candidates may have even been a WP:BLP violation. After reading the articles about these accidents, the blame would appear to belong to the motorcycle drivers. It's an unfortunate coincidence that both accidents happened during political caravans, but suggesting that the party selects it's candidate based on a drivers test is not helpful, and doesn't belong in the article or on it's talk page. If you're looking for an apology, the best you'll get from me is "I'm sorry if you were offended by my remarks." --Onorem♠Dil 13:27, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for Obvious sock of User:RYNORT continuing previous disruption. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Blaxthos ( t / c ) 06:25, 1 March 2008 (UTC)


This is laughable if it wasn't so embarrassing to Wikipedia's already shaky reputation.

BLAXTHOS falsely claims I'm an "Obvious sock of User:RYNORT"

A more accurate statement is that BLAXTHOS is an obvious MORON besides being a left wing idealogue whose edits that DON'T include a POV are the exception to the rule.

I have no idea who Rynort is. But I do know what a paranoid kook is. That is user BLAXTHOS.

Again, it shouldn't be that hard to figure out if ANYONE but me uses this account (and trust me no one does)

In fact this DUFAS Blaxthos DID run a trace on me and found out that I use Comcast in Ann Arbor Mich (which is correct.)

Now run the same test on Rynort, Sherlock...

How does this MANIACAL NUTCASE get the authority to BLOCK users such as me on a hunch?

I'll make you a bet: If you can prove I'm rynort, I'll give you a million dollars

If you can't, then Wikipedia must immediately begin to answer to an oversight committed comprised of Kenneth Starr, Jack Abramoff, John Ashcroft and...


...Karl Rove

LOL!!

Again, BLAXTHOS has slandered me. I am not Rynort. And he should not be allowed to block me without proof. 69.244.181.184 (talk) 18:36, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Too Funny

I went through and found user:BLAXTHOS 'proof' that I am Rynort.

His STRONGEST piece of evidence, and I SWEAR TO GOD I am not making this up, is, and I have to quote it precisely, cause it's sooo damn funny, is:



"Notice the idiosyncratic "lol""



I'm not kidding. This guy is the BIGGEST DUFAS on the planet and wikipedia gives him this kind of power? That's like allowing a developmentally disabled person to be the head of the DNC. (Whooops! Sorry, bad example.)

LOL! I mean...um...no...not LOL...what I meant was..hahahaha!

LOL!!!

This is the link: See for yourself - http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=179826066#Persistant_harassment

TTYL... 69.244.181.184 (talk) 18:47, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Uh,oh...MORE 'idosyyncratic behavior' lol!!!

[edit] April 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Lonnie Frisbee has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. — Werdna talk 09:51, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] ANI

THis is to let you know a conversation at ANI has been started in regards to your recent edits on ASE's page. You can find it here. APK yada yada 14:25, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked for 3 Months

To edit, please log in.

Editing by anonymous users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled. Registered users, however, are still able to edit. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, you may email us using an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network.

In your email, please tell us your preferred username and an account will be created for you. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 02:19, 27 April 2008 (UTC)