User talk:69.231.127.140

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This host, adsl-69-231-127-140.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net, is registered to AT&T Internet Services, an Internet service provider through which numerous individual users may connect to the Internet via proxy. This IP address may be reassigned to a different person when the current user disconnects.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism, in which case, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user.


Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

[edit] Removing an AfD message

Hello. This edit of yours contravened clearly expressed instructions. Please don't remove the AfD notice again; doing so will be treated as vandalism. -- Hoary 12:45, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] November 2007

It is suspected that this user might be a meatpuppet of SofiaValentino.
Please refer to Edward Donato, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Donato for evidence. See block log, page moves, and current autoblocks.

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Donato. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as the text has been restored from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Triwbe 17:37, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User:Hoary. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Gscshoyru 04:35, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please do not attack other editors, which you did here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Donato. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Gscshoyru 04:37, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Donato, you will be blocked from editing. Gscshoyru 04:47, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 24 hours as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. WjBscribe 05:39, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Allegation of deletion, and other mysteries

Hello IP! Your list of contributions shows that you have been having a bit too much fun. But one edit in particular caught my attention: this one. It says, among other things, Horay is a total fraud. Nothing more that a putz who has no idea what he's talking about. . . . Horry- you're a silly little dork . . . Now, if I were one of WP's more legalistic citizens, I might be worried that you were perpetrating what's locally called a "personal attack". But as it happens that doesn't worry me in the slightest, because I vaguely infer that, despite difficulties in spelling, you're addressing me, and I have a thick skin. You continue: You completely and totally wrecked a brilliant photographers article, editing it down to a nub, and removed the lovely pictures. I infer that you're alleging that I did this.

Here's the edit history of the article. I see a grand total of three (3) edits by me:

  1. In this one, I add warning templates. I remove nothing.
  2. In this one, I attach the AfD template. I remove nothing.
  3. In this one, I restore the AfD template (illicitly removed by you). I remove nothing.

That's it. Did I miss something?

Another remarkable fact is that in this edit you call yourself T.R. (Full time curator, with a Phd in fine art) Los Angeles, November 1, 2007, but in this one you call yourself Ron perlman. Do the two of you guys, "T.R. and "Ron perlman", just happen to share the same IP number? -- Hoary 06:45, 2 November 2007 (UTC)