User talk:69.22.98.162

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This IP address is that of User:Licorne, who has been banned from Wikipedia by order of ArbCom (see User talk:Licorne). If you are not the above user, please feel free to contact an admin. As this IP may be occasionally used by other people, blocks should be set for non-infinite, though long, periods of time. Other admins should feel free to block at will if it appears to be Licorne evading his block (any edits to Einstein-related pages are probably Licorne). --Fastfission 00:08, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Welcome / About registration

Hello, 69.22.98.162, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Here are a few more good links for to help you get started:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Benon 21:30, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and gives you many benefits, including:

  • The use of a username of your choice, provided that it is appropriate.
  • The ability to view all your contributions via a "My contributions" link.
  • Your own user page.
  • Your own talk page which, if you choose, also allows users to send you messages without knowing your e-mail address.
  • The use of your own personal watchlist to which you can add articles that interest you.
  • The ability to start new pages.
  • The ability to rename pages.
  • The ability to edit semi-protected pages.
  • The ability to upload images.
  • The ability to customize the appearance and behavior of the website.
  • The eligibility to become an administrator.
  • The right to be heard in votes and elections.
  • Your IP address will no longer be visible to other users.

We hope you enjoy your time here on Wikipedia and that you choose to become a Wikipedian by creating an account. Feel free to ask me any questions you may have on my talk page. By the way, you should sign your name to your posts and comments with ~~~~.Benon 21:30, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

You are much less likely to get reverted if you get an account and log in. Just FYI. --DanielCD 22:27, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Warnings

Note: Remember to always substitute user warning templates. For help on user warnings, see the WikiProject on User Warnings.
[Admin: block | unblock / Info: contribs | kate's tool | page moves | block log | block list]

[edit] January 2006

  1. Regarding the article Albert Einstein: This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Consider this your special and last new years chance to turn over a new leaf. Prodego talk 20:50, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
    I fail to see how Anon has vandalized the Einstein page in his most recent edit (re: Poincare). Perhaps a good and honest conversation on the talk page of the Einstein article will give the relevant editors there a chance to turn over "new leafs" of their own. Lucidish 01:25, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
  2. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jwissick(t)(c) 04:31, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
  3. This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jwissick(t)(c) 04:33, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
  • You have been blocked from editing for half a fortnight in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated addition of contested information without discussion despite warnings. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to do so after the block expires. // Pathoschild 04:47, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Your block has been reduced to 24 hours from the time of this message at the request of another user. Repeatedly adding contested facts despite opposition from other editors is considered bad faith. Please discuss controversial changes on the article's talk page. // Pathoschild 07:15, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
    Before resuming editing, please familiarize yourself with the following Wikipedia policies. Knowledge of them will prevent your being blocked in the future and perhaps make you understand the terms in which people are discussing things.
    Thanks. --Fastfission 17:35, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
  1. Regarding the page Albert Einstein, this is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Adam1213 Talk + 13:50, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
  • You have been blocked from editing for 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy (violating the Three Revert Rule and for persistent POV pushing and edit warring). If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to do so after the block expires. Fastfission 22:47, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Also, please read the pages I posted up above before editing again, or else you will just find yourself blocked once again after a very short amount of time, with little to show for it. There are plenty of legitimate ways to propose content changes and to register your disagreement with particular statements in articles; you have not been engaged in any of them. --Fastfission 22:57, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
  1. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Winter 23:04, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
  2. This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Winter 23:05, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
  3. Pederasty in ancient Greece: I understand you think it's disputed, but please allow other users to share their input on the talk page before adding the template. --Winter 23:17, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
  4. Please do not keep undoing other people's edits without discussing them first. This is considered impolite and unproductive. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. Jkelly 23:45, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
  5. Hi. This [1] is WP:Vandalism. Please do not do this again. Thanks. Antandrus (talk) 04:06, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
You must start discussing your issues with articles, rather than simply adding "disputed" tags. -- SCZenz 16:45, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
  1. This message is regarding the article Henri Poincaré. Your change was determined to be unhelpful, and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. Thanks. - Ichiro 01:47, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

[3] [4] [5] [6]. —Kirill Lokshin 04:31, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

  1. You need to sign your talk page edits, otherwise it makes it hard to follow the discussion.

    You sign your edits by typing four tildes at the end, like this: ~~~~. That will automatically insert your user name (or IP address in your case) and a date stamp. Thanks! Herostratus 06:57, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

  2. Warning #1 for today. Stop removing the header in the Henri Poincaré article. --DanielCD 22:01, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
  3. That's hardly a case for censorship. A mistake on my part, perhaps, but I don't have any reason to censor any of that. If you have a case, and think I was in error, let me know in a polite tone and we'll make sure it gets fixed. It's as simple as that. --DanielCD 22:08, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
    Go ahead and replace the material. I am going to ask for a review of the situation though, as I don't know enough about this subject to make a proper judgement. At first glance, it looks like vandalism. Also remember, your attitude is going to affect how successful you are at making your point. You will get a much better response from ppl if you are polite. --DanielCD 22:15, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
  4. Leave it be until I figure out what's going on. If you delete other peoples' POV tags, I'm going to put a protect on the article. --DanielCD 22:20, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
  5. Why are you deleting material from the talk pages? --DanielCD 22:25, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
    To Daniel, my name is Dean Mamas, PhD Physics UCLA. I believe it is Michael Macrossan who has suddenly and with no prior warning, nor explanation, cut up the entire Poincare page and deleted all the discussion as well. Please reinstate the Poincare page and discussion exactly as it was this morning and do something about Macrossan. 69.22.98.162 22:39, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
    To Daniel: I have deleted NOTHING -- I want everything reinstated just as it was this morning. 69.22.98.162 22:42, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
    I see your concern. I can't now (or I'll get locked in this building!) I'll have to look at the situation when I get home this evening. Just know that what's right will be done. Be patient; all sides will be given their say, and as I don't really give two shits (excuse the lang.) what the article says (within reason...), I think I'm disinterested enough to say I'll make sure everything is taken into account. --DanielCD 22:43, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
    I spent three weeks constructing the article, point by point, argument by argument, providing SOURCES (top sources) at each step, and now someone steps in with no explanation and cuts up the entire article. 69.22.98.162 22:51, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
  6. Advice: Please stop targeting one or more users' talk pages for abuse or insults, unwarranted doctoring or blanking. It can be seen as vandalism and may get you blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Winter 23:38, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Licorne

Hello,

An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Licorne. Please add evidence to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Licorne/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Licorne/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, --Tony Sidaway 19:42, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Licorne

A final decision has been reached in the above arbitration case, and it has been closed.

For the Arbitration Committee. --Tony Sidaway 04:18, 24 March 2006 (UTC)