User talk:69.19.14.44

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia. It would be appreciated if you would not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. This IP is a shared IP belonging to Direcway. Please use short bans if there is ever any vandalism from this IP. Thanks. 69.19.14.44 22:07, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Jack Johnson (musician) on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Blast san 23:38, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Re: James Kim

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to James Kim. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Crossmr 23:22, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

With regards to your comments on Talk:James Kim: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. --Crossmr 23:26, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to James Kim, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Crossmr 00:06, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to French and Indian War

Your recent edit to French and Indian War (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 23:12, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but you may wish to create a account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits, including:

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and create an account. Feel free to ask me any questions you may have on my talk page. By the way, make sure to sign and date your comments with four tildes (~~~~). --AW 20:17, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Edits made in February 2007

Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Cardinal Newman High School (West Palm Beach, Florida). Your edits could be considered vandalism, and they have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Posted by User: Hdt83 | Talk/Chat 00:04, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Rwanda, you will be blocked.--Pethr 02:12, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] March 2007

Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Ancient Egypt. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Caster23 01:11, 16 March 2007 (UTC)


[edit] March 2007

Please do not attack other editors, which you did here: Talk:Aum Shinrikyo . If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —dgiestc 07:13, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice

[edit] May 2007

Hi, the recent edit you made to Karma has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks – Gurch 19:02, 1 May 2007 (UTC)


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Number of the Beast, you will be blocked from editing.

Jebba 02:43, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. -- KOS | talk 09:37, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Revolutionary Road

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Revolutionary Road (film), is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 20:17, 13 August 2007 (UTC)


[edit] KMP Starsky

Please give a verifiable source of your info that there is no dominant male and De la Soul, Mozart,and Kinkaju are sharing the dominant female position. Cruise meerkat 22:56, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Dimitris Spanoulis

Why do you keep removing the tags for deletion from this article? I mean the article is crap, no offense, and Dimitris Spanoulis is not a widely known player. He's only known due to his brother Spanoulis.Reply on my talk page. Many thanks.Sergiogr 15:34, 9 September 2007 (UTC)


You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our polices concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Blocked for personal attacks. NawlinWiki 18:28, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] September 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:NewEnglandYankee, you will be blocked from editing. Oxymoron83 18:28, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

This is your final warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User:NewEnglandYankee, you will be blocked from editing. Oxymoron83 18:29, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Church of Scientology. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. delldot talk 02:49, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] October 2007

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. --John 21:15, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

Well, you were warned [1] William M. Connolley 21:16, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] November 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Cooperative extension service. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Collectonian 07:53, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] December 2007

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Knowledge Management, without explaining the reason for the removal in the edit summary. Unexplained removal of content does not appear constructive, and your edit has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you. --Jauerback 12:04, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Editing concerns

  1. You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. --Kukini hablame aqui 18:20, 4 December 2007 (UTC)


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Knowledge Management, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Knowledge Management was changed by 69.19.14.44 (c) (t) blanking the page on 2007-12-05T00:38:39+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 00:38, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. --TheNextOneAcross (talk) 00:39, 5 December 2007 (UTC)


You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia for repeated vandalism. When the block expires you are free to continue editing if you intend to make useful contributions. However, if you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, this IP address will be subject to a longer block.

bibliomaniac15 00:45, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Saddam Hussein, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Saddam Hussein was changed by 69.19.14.44 (c) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2008-01-19T03:51:25+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 03:51, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Ice hotel has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks Majorly (talk) 18:10, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of cities in Kansas, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: List of cities in Kansas was changed by 69.19.14.44 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-03-14T01:26:23+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 01:26, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (film), without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. E Wing (talk) 14:11, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Hi, the recent edit you made to James Madison has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. -/- Warren 23:35, 24 April 2008 (UTC)