User talk:69.19.14.29

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Proxy Address for a Major ISP

This IP address is used by DirectWay (now Hughesnet) as a forward proxy for multiple users, it is not representative of one person, when considering any edits or remarks made by a user from this IP address please consider this.



Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --Nick123 (t/c) 23:51, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Nick123 (t/c) 23:52, 18 January 2006 (UTC)


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. RENTASTRAWBERRY FOR LET? röck 23:56, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

Okay. I've seen your edits. They're mainly just stupid things not severe at all so I'm not going to give you your final warning yet. This is a pre-final warning. You can write anything you want on Wikipedia:Sandbox. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page. RENTASTRAWBERRY FOR LET? röck 00:14, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

Please do not delete sections of text or valid links from Wikipedia articles. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. RexNL 00:32, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add commercial links (or links to your own private websites) to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia as we drive for print or DVD publication; see the welcome page to learn more. Thanks. -Will Beback 21:47, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Elliott Yamin. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Geneb1955Talk/CVU 17:32, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Ohio State University

Your recent edit to Ohio State University (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 02:24, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your comments on Talk:Big Bang

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on Talk:Big Bang. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from editing. Xiner (talk, email) 00:34, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

With regards to your comments on Talk:Big Bang: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Xiner (talk, email) 00:34, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Please don't be silly

Like [1] William M. Connolley 00:02, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

If anything was silly, it was your classification of User:69.19.14.29's comment as uncivil. ~ UBeR 23:16, 10 March 2007 (UTC)


Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. As a member of the Wikipedia community, I would like to remind you to adhere to Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy for editors, which you appear to have violated at Robert McKenna. Thank you. -SpuriousQ (talk) 14:07, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Diane Kruger

Your recent edit to Diane Kruger (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 15:37, 24 March 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Regarding edits made during March 24, 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. PrestonH(Sandbox) • (Sign Here!) 15:41, 24 March 2007 (UTC)


This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. PrestonH(Sandbox) • (Sign Here!) 15:45, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism Warning

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism, which under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Cyril Thomas 15:45, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for vandalizing Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. --May the Force be with you! Shreshth91 15:47, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Roman army (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 21:28, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] June 2007

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Pearl Jam, you will be blocked from editing. Spartan-James 22:45, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing.

[edit] july 2007

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing.


[edit] Alexander

If you are Alexander you need to start logging on as Alexander. Otherwise you need to stop posting as though you are Alexander. --Blue Tie 19:57, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Alexander / Disruption

Please stop signing yourself as Alexander, without some evidence that you are said person [2]. The next time you do this you will be blocked. Please stop being disruptive on t:GW; ditto William M. Connolley 20:43, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] October 2007

[edit] Regarding your edits to Education in the United States:

Your recent edit to Education in the United States (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II 22:11, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Dora the Explorer

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Dora the Explorer, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. PubliusFL 22:45, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] November 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jean Toomer, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Jean Toomer was changed by 69.19.14.29 (c) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2007-11-14T01:49:55+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot 01:50, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding edits to Online learning community

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, 69.19.14.29! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule \bfreewebs\.com\/.+, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links guidelines for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! AntiSpamBot 23:36, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Your recent edit to Sara Bareilles (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. Please do not add email addresses/phone numbers, Imageshack/Photobucket/Flickr, or related links to non-talk pages if possible. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II (talk) 00:02, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Korn (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 00:43, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Mitchel Musso (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. Please do not add email addresses/phone numbers, Imageshack/Photobucket/Flickr, or related links to non-talk pages if possible. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II (talk) 04:23, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Guadalajara Zoo do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.  

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: 'youtube\.com' (link(s): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NJHgOnQ6WEk&feature=related) . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image or a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thorougly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creators copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 18:55, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

[edit] April 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Luminosity has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Calvin 1998 (t-c) 01:31, 26 April 2008 (UTC)