User talk:69.181.54.126

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 Welcome== ==Welcome! 2 3rr on ball hog 3 Response to "Unnecessary Edits" 4 3rr 5 Resolving the conflict on Ball hog 6 User notice: temporary 3RR block 6.1 Regarding reversions[1] made on August 16, 2006 (UTC) to Ball hog 7 Just to note

[edit] Welcome== ==Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and gives you many benefits, including:

• The use of a username of your choice, provided that it is appropriate.
• The use of your own personal watchlist to which you can add articles that interest you.
• The ability to start new pages.
• The ability to rename pages.
• The ability to edit semi-protected pages.
• The ability to upload images.
• The ability to customize the appearance and behavior of the website.
• The eligibility to eventually become an administrator.
• Your IP address will no longer be visible to other users.

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and create an account. Feel free to ask me any questions you may have on my talk page. By the way, make sure to sign your posts and comments with four tildes (~~~~), which will let others know who left it. Wikipediarules2221 02:00, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 3rr on ball hog

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you.Wildnox 23:44, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Additionally, do not remove cited information with no edit summaries.Wildnox 23:44, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Response to "Unnecessary Edits"

Please stop labeling or providing stereotype of what a ball hog is. Allen Iverson is such a ball hog that he has 7 assists per game? Does that make sense?

Irrelevent, what you just said consitutes original research. See Wikipedia:No original research

Do not put Iverson or Kobe's name in the citation. Just because some beat writers from ESPN or MSNBC say such and such are ballhog doesn't make it true. ESPN and MSNBC are "opinion" columns. The writers intentionally pick those players so they can gain more readers which translate to money.

The part of the article removed never says it's true, it says they have been labelled so by some, proper citation was provided. You can't remove something just because you don't agree with it, that would lack NPOV

WARNING: Any citation of any player will be reverted and deleted.

It is not unlikely you will be banned after violating 3RR in an effort to push your POV on an article. So I doubt this. Wildnox 00:43, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 3rr

hi, you've been temporarily blocked from editing wikipedia for a 3RR violation on ball hog. This block will expire in eight hours. please refrain from edit warring! continued 3rr violations will result in longer blocks. thanks. --heah 03:20, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Resolving the conflict on Ball hog

Now, sadly you've been blocked, but luckily this is only temporary and most likely you won't even notice, since it appears to be just an overnight block. I readded the bit onto the article, but I don't want it to stay the way it is. What would be ideal is that you, myself, and anyone else who edits the article could find a solution to the problem. My idea would be to include the bit as is, but include counterpoint stating how the labelling of either of the players as "ball hogs" is debatable. Additionally it would in my opinion be better to include more examples of players who have been labelled ball hogs, preferably from more than just the recent years. Hopefully we can resolve this problem with a level of Civility. Wildnox 05:25, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User notice: temporary 3RR block

[edit] Just to note

If nobody but you and I participate in the attempt at a compromise after a few days, I would have no opposition to just letting you delete the section. --Wildnox 20:25, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Nobody ever tried to participate in the compromise, therefore, I see no continued consensus to keep the section, I'm deleting the bit. --Wildnox 23:59, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

---

This is the discussion page for an anonymous user, identified by the user's numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. Registering also hides your IP address. [WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • Traceroute • Geolocate • Tor check • Rangeblock finder] · [RIRs: America · Europe · Africa · Asia-Pacific · Latin America/Caribbean]