User talk:69.171.243.115

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please do not vandalize my user page. That sort of behavior can get you blocked from editing Wikipedia. — Mateo SA | talk 21:46, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Irwin Schiff

Fine, Irwin Schiff should have an opportunity to defend himself against your attacks. Stop blocking any reference to his page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.171.243.115 (talk • contribs) 21:49, 1 October 2005

There is a reference to Schiff's site on the page Irwin Schiff, but not a direct link to his site. Any reasonably intelligent person should be able to copy and paste the site name to be able to get to his site and learn the "truth". — Mateo SA | talk 21:55, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

Any reasonably intelligent person shouldn't be constantly trying to censor a direct link to the person the article is about. The best way to learn about someone is to let the person's views be expressed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.171.243.115 (talk • contribs) 22:07, 1 October 2005

[edit] Editing other users' user pages

You've done this several times to User:Mateo SA. Please don't do it again. If I see you editing another user's user page (different than their talk page), I will block you from editing Wikipedia. I know you've been in a content dispute with him over an article, but that's no excuse to vandalize his user page. · Katefan0(scribble) 22:30, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Irwin Schiff again

You did not "create" the article Irwin Schiff. You copied in material from a tax protester site. Your original "work" amounted to pasting in an advertisement. It may be technically accurate that the judge ruled against some of Schiff's "evidence" in the trial, but your edit misleads readers into thinking he wasn't allowed to present any evidence. Your citation from a lunatic fringe site is not a valid or neutral source, and is not valid support for your "arguments". — Mateo SA | talk 18:51, 8 November 2005 (UTC)