User talk:69.17.97.216

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

An editor has expressed a concern that this user may be a sock puppet of Epistades.
Please refer to editing habits and/or contributions; this policy subsection may also be helpful.

Account information: block log – current autoblocks – edits – logs

Thank you for experimenting with the page Chris Simon on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --Muéro(talk/c) 18:21, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Ryan Hollweg page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. ccwaters 18:53, 13 March 2007 (UTC) Sorry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.17.97.216 (talk)

Contents

[edit] Edit Summaries

Edit summaries, are not to be used for insulting others. GoodDay 18:16, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Concerning Forsberg's status as a UFA? Being a UFA means, you're not on any team. Forsberg is currently not a Predator. GoodDay 18:24, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Fine, just don't deface my other contributions, such as the awards he has one. Believe it or not I know what I'm talking about. Cheers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.17.97.216 (talk)

Fair enough, just stop being insulting to other editors. When you carry on like that, you're only hurting yourself. GoodDay 18:47, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

And yet you do it again... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.17.97.216 (talk)

You're mistakened, check the Forsberg page's history. GoodDay 21:22, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] July 2007

This is your last warning. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people as you did at Peter Forsberg, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Edit summaries are not to be used for personal attacks. You have been warned a number of times. Angus Lepper(T, C, D) 22:48, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Ah no, this sockpupeteer was just 'blocked' (at his 'user page'). Here we go, again. GoodDay 22:56, 17 July 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Luis Gonzalez nickname warring

Hey there. I'm writing concerning your insistence on including the nicknames "LuGo" and "Long Gone" on the article Luis Gonzalez (outfielder). If these are actually nicknames for Luis Gonzalez, please include a source for them and explain on the talk to other editors why you think it should be included in the introduction. Maybe if you can find a source, these nicknames would be beter suited somewhere else in the article. Also please stop removing the "Gonzo" nickname. It is Luis' most commonly used nickname and it is well-referenced in the source I added so stop removing it in favor of two nicknames that ape probably no more than fan pet names. You have a precedence for this in Wikipedia articles. Derek Jeter's article doesn't have a ridiculous list of "The Captain", "Captain Clutch", "Jetes", "Mr. November" in his introduction. On Mariano Rivera, consensus was reached that the nicknames "Sandman" and "The Hamer of God" did not remain in the introduction but rather in a footnote. So please go see Talk:Luis Gonzalez (outfielder) before eiting nicknames again. Canjth 13:14, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

I thought this sockpuppet was 'blocked'. He's getting to be a nuisance. GoodDay 22:59, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding your edits to Tucker Max:

Your recent edit to Tucker Max (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a hosting or shared IP address to add email addresses, phone numbers, YouTube, Geocities, Myspace, Facebook, blog, forum, or other such free-hosting website links to a non-talk page. Please note that such links are generally to be avoided. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II 03:59, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Matrix

It's not important. One cast member name alone is not enough for an entire section: Neo is an anagram of "One". It's more relevant to the character than the film too. Alientraveller (talk) 21:19, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Alientraveller (talk) 21:31, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
I advise you also read WP:AVTRIVIA. Alientraveller (talk) 21:33, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Again? Seriously, once again this does not merit an entire section unto itself. Alientraveller (talk) 21:30, 14 December 2007 (UTC)


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to The Matrix, you will be blocked from editing. TINYMark (Talk) 10:38, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
As mentioned before, this does not deserve a section of its own. And, if you want to put it anywhere else, please make sure you reference it, otherwise it is original research. Nobody will dispute the accuracy of this, but Wikipedia is not about accuracy or truth, it's about founded statements that can be followed up by other people. TINYMark (Talk) 10:38, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

I understand. Apologies.

[edit] January 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Peter Forsberg has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. · AndonicO Hail! 02:13, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Okay. Thank you anyway.

[edit] Your edits to Stan Mikita

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
If you continue to make personal attacks on other people as you did at Stan Mikita, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. However much you think that people disagreeing with you are "morons" - a violation of WP:CIVIL you have breached in the past - here you are just plain wrong. The team used the name "Black Hawks" until 1986, spanning the entirety of Mikita's playing career.  RGTraynor  07:03, 8 March 2008 (UTC) oh my god.

Daaaamn. Busted.