User talk:69.161.213.251

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

  1. Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --ZsinjTalk 01:11, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Sledgehammer

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Sledgehammer. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. CaptainVindaloo t c e 23:28, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to EBay

Your recent edit to EBay (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 21:09, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Xmas

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Xmas, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

[edit] Your edit to Bomb

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Bomb, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Chrisch 11:24, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

I do not see how my edit to bomb was vandalism. If you could lead me in the right direction, I would be greatly thankful.

69.161.213.251 19:55, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Hi there. While your contribution to Bomb was technically correct under the IPA, it is unneccessary for a simple (and common) four letter word. Words in articles that are less common, longer, and strange to pronounce would benefit more from the addition of it's IPA equivilent, rather than short and simple words. You also did not put an edit summary, which could also lead editors to believe that it is jibberish. A good edit summary for the change you made to bomb would be: "Added phoenetics to 'bomb' as per IPA".

Please feel free to add phoenetics to other words and articles, but only where they are needed. You can contact me if you wish to discuss this further :)

PS: If you genuinly believe that English-speaking people would benefit by having the phoenetics included in the Bomb article, feel free to discuss it on the article's talk page.

Chrisch 03:22, 28 December 2006 (UTC)