User talk:69.140.68.72

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This host, c-69-140-68-72.hsd1.va.comcast.net, is registered to Comcast Cable Communications, Inc, an Internet service provider through which numerous individual users may connect to the Internet via proxy. This IP address may be reassigned to a different person when the current user disconnects.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism, in which case, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user.


Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.


Contents

[edit] Welcome

Hello, 69.140.68.72, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --Dweller 22:24, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Warnings

[edit] July 2007

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Generic drug. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.

Please do not attempt to insert original research or your personal opinions into Wikipedia articles. You may add in statements which are verifiable by reliable sources. Otherwise, your edit appears to be vandalism. MKoltnow 15:11, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] September 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, adding content of marginal relevance (unnecessary trivia) to articles, as you did to Stuyvesant High School, is not considered productive. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Also, using phrases such as "this writer…" make the article read like a newspaper editorial rather than one from an encyclopedia. bmitchelfTF 19:16, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User:Arthur Rubin

The place to put comments directed to articles are on the article talk page (Talk:Pi) or on the user talk page of a user (User Talk:Arthur Rubin). I will consider the comment, even though editing someone's User page except to remove policy violations is often considered vandalism. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 19:32, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Dolichorhynchops, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Hmrox (talk) 15:11, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] Response

Please explain to me how adding a line that explicates the rather academically heavy "explanation" of what a Dolichorhynchops is constitutes vandalism. You really need more productive tasks to keep you busy.

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Wizards of Waverly Place. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. NrDg 18:36, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Moises Arias, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NrDg 18:39, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Blue Whale. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Oxymoron83 20:55, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to The NeverEnding Story (film) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. ScarianCall me Pat 21:36, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to O. J. Simpson murder case has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Sam Korn (smoddy) 16:22, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to O. J. Simpson murder case constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Sam Korn (smoddy) 16:23, 1 February 2008 (UTC))

[edit] March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Mark Zuckerberg has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. · AndonicO Hail! 16:31, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Cross product. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Silly rabbit (talk) 01:32, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Stuyvesant High School, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. JSpung (talk) 15:37, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Stuyvesant High School, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. JSpung (talk) 15:41, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Stuyvesant High School. J.delanoygabsadds 15:44, 1 April 2008 (UTC)