User talk:69.130.18.93

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Blanking user page

Users are allowed to remove warnings and blank their page. If they remove it, we can assume they've read it. It doesn't particularly stand in their favour. In such cases, leave a clear edit summary, as that will be the main visible record. They're not allowed to be uncivil of course, or to ban legitimate discourse, but avoid leaving posts unless necessary. These points have been established over the last few months at WP:AN and WP:AN/I. It used to be something which got sanctioned, but it isn't any more. This hasn't yet percolated through to a lot of users (as above), who are still leaving warnings in good faith. Tyrenius 00:23, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA

I realise you are having a frustrating time at the moment, but please don't attack people, or you'll end up getting into trouble. It's all in hand. Feel free to remove this, as I'm sure you will want to. Tyrenius 02:04, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WP:SOCK

Please be aware that as of this request for checkuser, case listed here: Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/PGLanier, you have been identified operating the IP address account here and the user account PGLanier. Your "tag-team" reversions on the Daedalus class battlecruiser page several days ago with User:Matthew is an example of unacceptable behaviour on wikipedia. You are not permitted to tag-team your way through a 3RR dispute and are not permitted to use alternate accounts to avoid blocking, if you are found doing it again you will be reported as per WP:SOCK policy and will have a notice posted to the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard. Thanks. - Count23 14:25, 10 April 2007 (UTC)