User talk:69.115.23.71

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

An editor has expressed a concern that this user may be a sock puppet of Tanninglamp.
Please refer to editing habits and/or contributions; this policy subsection may also be helpful.

Account information: block log – current autoblocks – edits – logs

Contents

[edit] 1st Warning regarding your edits to Mike Francesa

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Mike Francesa, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Psantora (talk • contribs)

[edit] 1st Warning regarding your edits to Ralph Nader

Thank you for experimenting with the page Ralph Nader on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --Nnp 00:02, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Personal attacks

You have violated Wikipedia:No personal attacks.[1] I have removed the offending material from my talk page. You seem to have a problem with my edits here. See Wikipedia:Verifiability on why I have been removing the content. If you can verify that obesity is the reason for Francesa's knee surgery, by all means add it to the article - along with supporting evidence. Otherwise it is libel and could get you banned. PaulC/T+ 02:34, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 2nd Warning regarding your edits to Mike Francesa

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Mike Francesa. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Mhking 23:38, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Do not remove warnings from your talk page

Please do not remove warnings from your talk page or replace them with offensive content. Removing warnings from your talk page will not remove them from the page history. If you continue to remove warnings from your talk page, you will lose your privilege of editing your talk page. Thanks. RexNL 23:52, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 3rd Warning regarding your edits to Mike Francesa

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Mike Francesa. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. AndreniW 00:46, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 4th Warning regarding your edits to Mike Francesa

Please do not add commentary and your personal analysis of an article into Wikipedia articles, as you did at Mike Francesa. Doing so violates Wikipedia's NPOV rules and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --SomeStranger (t|c) 01:48, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 1st Warning regarding your edits to Keith Olbermann

Your recent edit to Keith Olbermann (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 01:21, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 2nd Warning regarding your edits to Keith Olbermann

This is your last warning for editing Keith Olbermann (diff). The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. // AntiVandalBot 01:26, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 5th Warning regarding your edits to Mike Francesa

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Mike Francesa, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. --Zimbabweed 10:32, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Reliable sources needed

Your recent contribution(s) to Wikipedia are very much appreciated. However, you did not provide references or sources for your information. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a drive to improve the quality of Wikipedia by encouraging editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. If sources are left unreferenced, it may count as original research, which is not allowed. Can you provide in the article specific references to any books, articles, websites or other reliable sources that will allow people to verify the content in the article? You can use a citation method listed at inline citations that best suits each article. Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zzuuzz (talk • contribs)

[edit] More personal attacks 1 November 2006

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to User:Ndphil21, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Also, read Wikipedia's policy on no personal attacks. Dar-Ape 01:05, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] More personal attacks 10th Jan

This is your last warning. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. TheOne00 21:51, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Reported to WP:AIV

You have continued to vanadise after a final warning, and have been reported to WP:AIV.TheOne00 21:56, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Warning regarding your edit to Woody Allen

Thank you for experimenting with the page Woody Allen on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. SmilesALot 14:57, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Final Warning

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced defamatory content into an article, as you did to Keith Olbermann, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Goodnightmush 20:54, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 2nd Warning regarding your edits to Ralph Nader

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced defamatory content into an article, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ---Charles 22:40, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

I am going to make this plain and simple. Peter Schweitzer's book isn't a reliable source? The fact is well written and well researched.

[edit] 3rd Warning regarding your edits to Keith Olbermann

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced defamatory content into an article, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ---Charles 22:41, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] You've been blocked

Whether or not your posts on the Keith Olbermann talk page are appropriate or not is not important. You've been blocked for vandalism for 7 days, wait out your block and then you can contribute in a positive manner to Wikipedia. --Bobblehead (rants) 03:21, 30 June 2007 (UTC)