User talk:68.84.224.36

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 24 hours as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Bearian 16:35, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Absolutely beyond the pale, unbecoming a supposedly neutral source of information, and an instance of abusing a pathetically small amount of power. Wikipedia will never get a good reputation with this nonsense. Grow. Up. 68.84.224.36 05:39, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, 68.84.224.36, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Bearian (talk) 17:34, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

  • This is your last warning.
    The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please be civil in your discussions. Another snide comment, and I'll block this IP again. Bearian (talk) 17:37, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
Excuse me? Get your petty, pathetic abuse of irrelevant power away from here. I did nothing wrong, and I'm getting damned sick of this. I thought you would have been embarrassed by your previous ill-conceived foray into censorship, which was shown to be utterly baseless. Try it again, and I'll make a public spectacle of it. Wikipedia's reputation for asininity, pettiness, and inaccuracy is fully deserved, I can see. 68.84.224.36 (talk) 19:32, 21 December 2007 (UTC)