User talk:68.71.35.93

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you were just trying to experiment, then use the sandbox instead. Thank you. DJ Clayworth 21:52, 28 November 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] U.S. Census

You should know that religion is -never- asked on the U.S. Census, which is why the number has been removed.--Pharos 22:35, 28 November 2005 (UTC)

It appears you should have read Religion in the United States a little more carefully. The source of the numbers is actually a City University of New York study. [1]--Pharos 22:43, 28 November 2005 (UTC).

Maybe you should explain why that table is used in the wikipedia page about religion in the united states and a different figure is used in the page about the usa. A figure of 85 percent that is totally unreferenced. Also why the words US census appear underneath the table.

[edit] Superbowl XL

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. As a member of the Wikipedia community, I would like to remind you of Wikipedia's neutral-point-of-view policy for editors. In the meantime, please be bold and continue contributing to Wikipedia. Thank you! --Madchester 04:51, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you were just trying to experiment, then use the sandbox instead. Thank you.

Please do not add anymore POV commentary on the Superbowl article. Thanks. Maybe you should stop allowing clear POV commentary on the Super Bowl by the likes of aggrieved players and hack journos. --Madchester 17:18, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] March 2006

  1. Thanks for experimenting with the page Eddie Murphy on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 10:08, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
Wasnt a test but a factual contribution. And i intend to replace it.

Thanks for your efforts on the Bev Bevan article, they are appreciated. Welcome!

Hello, 68.71.35.93, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Sherurcij (talk) (Terrorist Wikiproject) 14:43, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Please sign comments

As a courtesy for other editors, it is a Wikipedia guideline to sign your talk page and user talk page posts. To do so simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments and your user name or IP address and the date will be automatically added along with a timestamp. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). For further info read Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. -Big Smooth 20:51, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding edits made during July 28, 2006 (UTC) to Ann Coulter

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. - Glen 03:46, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding edits made during July 28, 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. - Glen 04:00, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Which particular page have i vandalised?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.71.35.93 (talk • contribs) .


[edit] 3RR

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. You have reverted Ann Coulter 5 times on 28 July 2006.

[edit] Regarding edits made during July 28, 2006 (UTC) to Ann Coulter

This is your final warning. If you continue to vandalize pages on Wikipedia, make inappropriate edits or personal attacks, including inappropriate or offensive edit summaries, or continue to cause problems in other ways, you will be blocked from editing indefinitely.

If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. - Glen 04:05, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

What the hell are you talking about. I have merely added an adjective to someones article that is self evidently true , and people have vandalised my entry by removing it.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.71.35.93 (talk • contribs) .

Please read WP:NPOV - your adjective "sensationalist" is an opinion and hence why many others are removing it. - Glen 04:13, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

An opinion i share with the subject herself it would seem who describes herself as a pot stirrer. OK i will just go through the whole of wikipedia removing every adjective because they are clearly all opinions. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.71.35.93 (talk • contribs) .


I have a feeling you are smarter than this. If I say "the grass at the whitehouse is green" - green is an adjective yet because it is a undisputed fact it is not a point of view (POV). Now, if I say "the grass at the whitehouse is sensational" - that is simply my opinion. I also recommend you read WP:3RR and WP:AGF - Glen 04:22, 28 July 2006 (UTC) oh, and WP:SIG

May i recommend that you look up the definition of the word "many", and also look up the difference between abstract and concrete adjectives. Also please look up the 3 revert rule that you breached. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.71.35.93 (talk • contribs) .

Reverting vandalism is not part of WP:3RR. Please read this. -- Dcflyer 04:27, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

I'm not aware of any vandalism.

Im afraid it is you that must reread the 3RR rule, specifically the clause referring to the reverting of vandalism. Your edits (like it or not) constituted vandalism. Accept it. Now that you understand policy enough to quote it back to me I trust you'll behave, as you have received a final warning, last step before a block. Thanks for your time - Glen 04:31, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Once again , i am not aware of any vandalism. Please point it out to me.

[edit] Blocked

You have been temporarily blocked from editing because of your disruptive edits. You are invited to contribute in a constructive manner as soon as the block expires. Pilotguy (roger that) 04:36, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

I am not aware of any disruption.

Hi there. I have reverted your edits to Mel Gibson, as they are not supported by references and offer original research on a point of view as such. Happy editing to you. Teke 05:30, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Hi there, i am still editing thank you very much i was intending to put in the sources, just wait a while ok.

Will do! Thanks for responding. Teke 05:33, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Criticism Redux

the very fact that Mensa charges people to join its establishment should ring some alarm bells. Nowhere in the page does it mention that this is a subscription service. Effectively people pay to be told they are clever. This must also cast doubt on the veracity of claims that applicants must be within the top two percentiles to qualify. I have seen many "tests" in national papers where readers are told that if they can solve the puzzle they are eligible to join Mensa. For anyone with even the most rudimentary grasp of algebra these puzzles are very easy.68.71.35.93 05:31, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
American Mensa posts the qualifying scores of the most common standardized intelligence test on its web site. If all you want is to think you're clever by qualifying for Mensa, you can do that without sending them a penny. Of course, you don't need Mensa's permission to think you're clever. Jwolfe 08:33, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
Why should a membership fee "ring some alarm bells"? Even the Boy Scouts and the Freemasons have annual membership dues ... TANSTAAFL! ... show me social organization that doesn't charge for membership, and I'll show you an organization that doesn't have a Web site or a monthly magazine that's printed in color. (This is just common sense, people!) --141.156.240.102 15:57, 7 October 2006 (UTC)