User talk:68.62.20.94

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] January 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Buttocks has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks · AndonicO Hail! 10:18, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

The recent edit you made to Buttocks constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks · AndonicO Hail! 10:38, 20 January 2008 (UTC))

I fail to see how that edit could be considered vandalism. Barrylb (talk) 10:52, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
Sorry, just noticed it wasn't vandalism. I'm just learning to use an automated tool, and haven't quite gotten used to it... I apologize for the reverts/warnings. · AndonicO Hail! 10:58, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
NO problem Buddy 68.62.20.94 (talk) 10:59, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
Nice to see you helping out. :) Cheers, · AndonicO Hail! 11:01, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Nyce0001.jpg

I'll continue the discussion from MediaWiki talk:Bad image list#Image:Keeani Lei 5.jpg here, as there no longer appears to be action required related to the list.

A crop of Image:Nyce0001.jpg to the face would be fine for the article. I can't do it myself as I'm away from my normal computer. If you are going to be spending a significant amount of time doing image work, as you've done so far, I strongly suggest that you familiarize yourself with any photo editing software you already have on your computer or investigate some of the options at Category:Free graphics software. The other option is to make a request at Wikipedia:Graphic Lab/Images to improve. If you do so, please be sure to specify "NSFW" for those editors using public or work computers. My other suggestion is to set up an account, which is actually more anonymous than using the address given to you by your internet provider. In topics that are contentious or subject to high levels of vandalism, such as pornography, IP editors tend to draw more scrutiny and suspicion than those who have built up credibility with an account. Thanks, BanyanTree 00:13, 23 January 2008 (UTC)