User talk:68.35.108.94

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] April 2007

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to South Africa . Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Rexparry sydney 23:46, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:68.35.108.94. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Umalee 00:28, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.--ROASTYTOAST 19:11, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

do not remove warnings on your talkpage this is vandalism

Please do not remove legitimate warnings from this page. Doing so is disruptive and repeated disruptive behaviour can result in your being blocked from further editing. Rather than engaging in childish blanking and nonsense edits, as seems to be your wont, please turn your attention instead to making constructive edits to this encyclopedia. If you continue to engage in edits which are disruptive or which damage the work of others, you will be blocked. — Dave (Talk | contribs) 18:17, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

I've semi-protected this page for 24 hours -- if you're here to edit the wiki productively, please feel free to do so. If your sole purpose here is blanking your talk page, I'm not sure why you'd bother. Thanks for your time. – Luna Santin (talk) 18:38, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to South Africa, you will be blocked from editing. Zaian 12:48, 11 April 2007 (UTC)


[edit] April 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Super Mario World, you will be blocked from editing. —DerHexer (Talk) 19:31, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Super Mario World, you will be blocked from editing. Natalie 05:40, 15 April 2007 (UTC)


This user's request to have the autoblock on his/her IP address lifted has been DECLINED.

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Ichtragekeineschuhe3". The reason given for Ichtragekeineschuhe3's block is: "sock".

  • Decline reason:

Doesn't seem to be a shared IP. Because of persistent problems from this address, I'm blocking this IP from editing for a period of one week. Sorry. – Luna Santin (talk) 06:56, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Also, please instruct the user Rexparry Sydney to take his reference to this shared IP off his userpage. This constant revealing of this IP without good reason is endangering the users of this computer is it is unnecessarily revealing the IP to everyone on a continuous basis. Thank you.68.35.108.94 05:42, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

That's a talk page signature -- if you'd prefer to sign with a username, please register an account once this block expires. Thank you. – Luna Santin (talk) 06:56, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
So you are going to allow this threat to privacy continue? I don't see how that is fair, and if need be I'll take this over your head. Would you PLEASE ask him to take his comment about this shared IP off his userpage? It is not a signature, and it is threatening our privacy by constant revealing this IP.68.35.108.94 07:23, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
You seem to have missed the large banner, directly above the edit box, which warns you in advance that editing anonymously will permanently record your IP address into page history for everyone to see. Note that this address is not associated with any particular name, face, photo, or person -- if you register an account, the link to the IP will not affect you in any way that I can follow. If you feel that the link is somehow threatening your privacy, you're free to contact whomever you like about it -- they'll probably tell you about the same thing, though. =\ – Luna Santin (talk) 07:53, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
I still would like to see that particular message taken down, as it is a personal attack and I DO NOT want this IP to remain on his userpage, there is absolutely no reason for it other than than it pokes fun at the IP. Would you please ask him to remove it?68.35.108.94 18:06, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "There are sevaral users who use this IP for editing and education purposes, and we are not even sure who did these edits or why, or if they were even done by any one of us. Furthermore, there are users of this IP who don't even speak English, and cannot understand all of the warnings in full. I don't believe a block of one week is fair, as there is no evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that this IP is not shared. One of our most promonant users is EnglishEfternamn who is quite repudable and a member of VandalProof at that."

Decline reason: "The block is anonymous only, so, registered users can still edit. I don't see any productive edits from this IP address, shared, not shared, whatever the case may be.— Metros232 12:28, 15 April 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.


This user's request to have the autoblock on his/her IP address lifted has been DECLINED.

recurring problematic edits

  • Decline reason:

You have not been autoblocked. However, you have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock|your_reason_here}} to your talk page.

Please unblock this IP, it is shared and has nothing to do whatsoever with the accounts that have been blocked in association with this address. At the very least, the block should be shortened to 24 hours, there are other users here wishing to contribute positively.68.35.108.94 01:25, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Please do not waste our time with any more unblock requests. Nobody's buying it. We will protect this page if you continue to abuse the unblock template. --Yamla 02:19, 16 April 2007 (UTC)