User talk:68.32.229.23

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] November 2006

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. bibliomaniac15 Review? 04:34, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] January 2007

You have no reason to dismiss my edit. Besides, it took me a few minutes to understand what is the edit you are talking about... if yo are used with communist propaganda and want to get even more familiar, I will not complain. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.32.229.23 (talk • contribs) 22:21, January 6, 2007

...some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising in articles. For more information on this, see

OK, another smart guy. Which of my edits is the advertisement??? These days, the number of wikipedians trying to self-satisfy with no success is on the rise. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.32.229.23 (talk • contribs) 11:18, January 7, 2007
That would be this one. YouTube videos are irrelevant to the article in question; if readers want to see her singing Tornero, then they can look it up themselves. And by the way, unless you're trying to get blocked, I would recommend refraining from insulting our editors. Shadow1 (talk) 14:23, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
As far as I remember, I needed to provide a proof, a referrence, but when I offered it Eagle pretended it is copyright breach, advertising, and I gave up before coming up with something else, because I noticed he even didn't pay attention to my links. I can tell the difference between your contributions and mine, there's no point in banning me and making wikipedia even worse than you're making it right now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.32.229.23 (talk • contribs) 00:11, January 16, 2007

[edit] April 2007

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming, and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. Thanks. . --kingboyk 10:13, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Please blow me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.32.229.23 (talk • contribs) 08:49, April 16, 2007

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Martinp23 13:03, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Kingboyk reverted my edits, which were well explained and documented, without proving his POV, and it is not the first time when he acts in this manner. And he still has to blow me."

Decline reason: "Your block has been extended due to your continued incivility. — Yamla 14:55, 16 April 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "These people are mean to me."

Decline reason: "Wah. —Pilotguy cleared for takeoff 23:00, 16 April 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.


Please do not accuse editors of vandalism improperly. Thank you. --Geniac 12:54, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. --Geniac 04:07, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Please please me.