User talk:68.254.179.34

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

School IP address Attention:

This IP address, 68.254.179.34, is registered to Glendale-River Hills School District and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution. If the institution uses proxy servers, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason a message intended for one person may be received by another. Similarly an innocent user may be blocked for another user's vandalism. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please read our advice on this situation.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block with the template {{schoolblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of persistent vandalism from this IP address, anonymous editing may be disabled for up to 1 year at a time. Abuse reports may also be forwarded to your school administration for investigation.
School staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
Attention:

This IP address, 68.254.179.34, is registered to Glendale-River Hills School District and may be shared by multiple users. Comments left on this page may be received by other users of this IP and appear to be irrelevant. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking. Attempts to vandalize using this address will be reported to Glendale-River Hills School District as network abuse.

If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that this need not necessarily be the IP address of your machine. In many cases, it turns out to be the IP address of a proxy server that communicates between your browser and the Wikimedia servers. Such proxies are shared among a huge number of users compared to the number of persons using your particular machine. If you are frustrated by irrelevant comments appearing here, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself.


Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. K1Bond007 20:31, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Jimi Hendrix, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Syrthiss 20:56, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Ricky Martin on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. ObtuseAngle 20:15, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Cuban Missile Crisis

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Cuban Missile Crisis. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Beardo 17:12, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Some of your recent edits, such as those you made to Snake, have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Happy Editing by Snowolf(talk)CONCOI on 16:30, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Heget, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — Gareth Hughes 16:38, 26 February 2007 (UTC)



[edit] March 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Some of your recent edits, such as those you made to Puerto Rico, have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Leafyplant 13:59, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, please ignore this warning

Your recent edit to Indent (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 13:58, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] October 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Dwyane Wade. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tiptoety 18:43, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Prohibition of alcohol, you will be blocked from editing. Harland1 15:58, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Eastern Europe, you will be blocked from editing. JdeJ (talk) 15:59, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to 1920 in sports has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Tiddly-Tom 18:34, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Battle of Iwo Jima has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Rjd0060 (talk) 14:37, 23 April 2008 (UTC)