User talk:68.236.24.19

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] The Immunity Syndrome

Hi. Although there is absolutely no need for me to defend myself in reverting your opinion, which is not a "constructive" edit in the least, I have decided to go ahead and do so. Of course I do not own this website. For you to even allude to such is juvenile. First, your post about "many fans considering this when TOS jumped the shark" is mere second-hand reporting of an OPINION. Personal opinions are not permitted in a Wikipedia article. Then we must define what is "many." Is it ten, twenty or twenty thousand? If you can find a "reputable" website which undeniably states as a fact the opinion you wish to keep inserting, then by all means go for it. At that time, we can take it to the official admins for dispute resolution. Honestly, I believe you are, for the most part, acting in good faith, however snide you wish to make your edit log. Best. Sir Rhosis 19:41, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Blow it out your ass, Sir Rhosis. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.236.24.19 (talk • contribs)

Not to take sides on this argument or anything - but I feel the need to point out that I don't know how many episodes of the original series that I have heard as being considered the point where the series "jumped the shark". Saying "The Immunity Syndrome" is where it happened is entirely someone's opinion, as other sources have pointed out "Spock's Brain" and "The Way to Eden" were the turning points. In my opinion, yes those were lousy episodes, but they were all followed by much better ones, so I don't believe the show ever jumped the shark to begin with. First season's "The Alternative Factor" and "Operation: Annihilate!" were pretty weak too. Cyberia23 20:31, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Mind your own fucking business, Cyberia23. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.236.24.19 (talk • contribs)
My, aren't we a pissy little baby. Cyberia23 11:42, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
My, aren't we the little shit-faced ass-wipe, Cyberia23. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.236.24.19 (talk • contribs)

[edit] Amoeba

Two editors have now reverted your edit to amoeba to add the star trek reference. It is POV, unsourced and pretty irrelevant ot the page. Please do not replace it, and if you feel the burning need to do so, bring it up on the talk page for discussion first. Thanks, WLU 22:50, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Blow it out of your ass, WLU.

[edit] The Contents of this Page

THIS TALK PAGE BELONGS TO ME, I WILL BE THE FINAL ARBITER OF ITS CONTENTS. FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO DO NOT LIKE IT, THEN YOU CAN KISS MY SWEET WHITE ASS.

AS STATED BEFORE, I MAKE THE RULES ON THIS PAGE. HERE'S MY SWEET WHITE ASS, NOW PUCKER UP, SUCKER.

AND BOBO, YOU CAN SUCK MY DICK!

Actually, the page belongs to wikipedia, and if you continue as you are you are setting yourself up to get the IP address blocked. You are allowed a certain amount of leeway on talk pages, and you've pretty much already exceeded it. WLU 02:58, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
GO BLOW IT OUT YOUR ASS, WLU.

[edit] Note to Gravitan

Gravitan, do you really think that an asswipe such as yourself can make threats to me? Think again, jerkwad.

[edit] Warn!

Please stop. If you continue to make disruptive edits to your talk page such as blanking it or adding offensive content, you will not be able to edit it. Thank you.

Wow, I am really scared! And now for the question that we all have: Is English your native language, you stupid little cretin?

[edit] Amoeba and the Star trek reference

I have removed the material added by you again. If you disagree with this, please discuss on the talk page of the article. Personally, I do not think this information belongs in the Amoeba article because there are hundreds of stories in which amoeba-like organisms are a plot point, but ultimately they are just trivia which is discouraged on Wikipedia. And with regard to your comments on other editors on your talk page and on the Amoeba article: such comments constitute personal attacks and if you continue in that vein, you will be blocked again by an administrator. - TwoOars (Rev) 13:55, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

I've blocked this account for 1 week due to blatant vandalism upon returning from a previous block for vandalism.--Isotope23 talk 15:18, 19 September 2007 (UTC)