User talk:68.23.10.26
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Welcome
Hello! I've noticed that you have edited Wikipedia without logging in to an account. I'm happy that you've been contributing. However, I urge you to create an account. Here is a list of the benefits of having an account:
- You can create new pages
- You can use watchlists
- You can upload images
- You can keep your account from being unfairly blocked if you share an IP address
- You can use scripts to better fight annoying vandalism
- After four days, you can edit semi-protected pages
- After a while, you might be able to become an administrator
There are no cons to signing up for an account. In fact, there are more pros here! Signing up is completely free and you don't need to enter any personal information! Plus you can have a user page like mine! So, unless you can think of a con, sign up for an account right now! Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 21:46, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Criticism of Human Rights Watch
I think the entire section of "allegation of bias against India" in Criticism of Human Rights Watch article suffers from WP:UNDUE. The section was written to push POV using weak sources. Some person can analyse anything on an organization, but their analysis is given much importance here. Especially an article about Human Rights Watch, why so much importance is given on a single source? On a single person? It is WP:UNDUE. The entire section should be deleted as per WP:UNDUE. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 08:17, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] February 2008
It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from an article. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Ixfd64 (talk) 02:31, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
- I have to second this, and ask you NOT to remove content, like you did with Army of the Guardians of the Islamic Revolution. This is one of the most high-profile armed forces in the world today, very important for any discussion of any US action against Iran, and you removed the one neutral, authorative source (IISS)'s summary of their capabilities. Please DO NOT remove content in this fashion again. Buckshot06 (talk) 11:38, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
 | This is the discussion page for an anonymous user, identified by the user's numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. Registering also hides your IP address. [WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • Traceroute • Geolocate • Tor check • Rangeblock finder] · [RIRs: America · Europe · Africa · Asia-Pacific · Latin America/Caribbean] |
