User talk:68.227.217.170

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Attention:
	This IP address, 68.227.217.170, is registered to Cox Communications Inc.. In the event of vandalism from this address, efforts should be made to contact Cox Communications Inc. to report abuse, which can be done here. Contact information can be viewed in the WHOIS report.
	If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that it is possible for the owner of the IP, Cox Communications Inc., to determine who was making contributions from this address at a given time.
	If you are the owner of this address responding to reports of inappropriate conduct from this address, you may find the contributions history and block log for this address helpful. Please feel free to contact any administrator who has blocked this address with questions (blocking admins will be listed in the block log).

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. (HairMetalLives 00:22, 16 May 2007 (UTC))

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. (HairMetalLives 23:50, 24 May 2007 (UTC))

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. (HairMetalLives 00:23, 29 May 2007 (UTC))

[edit] Vandalism of Get the Picture (TV series)

Stop it. Just, stop it. How many times do I have to revert your vandalism before you get it through your thick head that YOU'RE NOT FUNNY. Knock it off, you loser! (HairMetalLives 03:32, 1 June 2007 (UTC))

Please refrain from insulting vandals.Wikidudeman ^(talk) 03:33, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

I have reverted your vandalism of Get the Picture (TV series) eight times. I will continue to revert your vandalism every time you screw up the page. It's a waste of your time, it isn't funny, and it doesn't add to Wikipedia in any way whatsoever. KNOCK IT OFF!! (HairMetalLives 00:58, 7 June 2007 (UTC))

It doesn't look like vandalism simply misunderstanding of Wikipedia style and format. User, Please see WP:T for more information.Wikidudeman ^(talk) 02:06, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

It's vandalism. He keeps changing a piece of correct information to to a piece of incorrect information. (HairMetalLives 01:51, 8 June 2007 (UTC))

That's not what vandalism means. WP:VAND:

"Inexperienced users often are unfamiliar with Wikipedia's formatting and grammatical standards (e.g. how to create internal and/or external links, when certain words should be bolded or italicized, etc.) Rather than label such users as vandals, just explain to them what our standard style is on the issue in hand - perhaps pointing them towards our documentation at Wikipedia:How to edit a page, and the like."

"Sometimes a user will add content to an article that is factually inaccurate, but in the belief that it is accurate. By doing so in good faith, they are trying to contribute to the encyclopedia and improve it rather than vandalize. If you believe inaccurate information has been added to an article in good faith, ensure that it is, and/or discuss its factuality with the user who has submitted it."

"While intentionally adding nonsense to pages is a form of vandalism, sometimes honest editors may not have expressed themselves correctly (there may be an error in the syntax, particularly for Wikipedians who use English as a second language). Also, sometimes connection errors or edit conflict unintentionally produce the appearance of nonsense or malicious edits. In either case, assume good faith."Wikidudeman ^(talk) 06:45, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

"Sometimes a user will add content to an article that is factually inaccurate, but in the belief that it is accurate...While intentionally adding nonsense to pages is a form of vandalism"

I'm 100% positive these edits are not in good faith and therefore vandalism. (I really should have mentioned the bad faith thing earlier, and for that I applolgize) His edits to other pages have also been nonsense, including changing blue links to links that don't lead anywhere. There was another instance like this a while back with another editor. He explained to me what he was doing and it turned out he was correct, and I appologized. No such thing has happened in this case because he knows exactly what he is doing. It's vandalism, I'm certain. (HairMetalLives 19:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC))

You should always assume good faith.Wikidudeman ^(talk) 02:02, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Always? Even when it's blatantly obvious that he's doing it just for laughs? Sorry, Wikidudeman, I just can't acceptgood faith in this instance. Look at his other edits (the few that he's made). They're nothing but garbage. (HairMetalLives 05:32, 9 June 2007 (UTC))

It's not obvious to me and I've looked at the edits. Even if he is a vandal, You shouldn't insult vandals. It does no good.Wikidudeman ^(talk) 03:34, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

All right, I won't insult the vandals anymore (you're right, it really doesn't do any good). But I am a little frustrated that his IP address hasn't blocked from editing after being reported four times and after vandalising pages numerous times after being warned three times. I really don't know what to do anymore except keep reverting his vandalism. (HairMetalLives 03:43, 10 June 2007 (UTC))

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Galileo's Cannonball, you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. The Sunshine Man 15:50, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

---

This is the discussion page for an anonymous user, identified by the user's numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. Registering also hides your IP address. [WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • Traceroute • Geolocate • Tor check • Rangeblock finder] · [RIRs: America · Europe · Africa · Asia-Pacific · Latin America/Caribbean]