User talk:68.225.171.78

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and gives you many benefits, including:

We hope you enjoy your time here on Wikipedia and that you choose to become a Wikipedian by creating an account. Feel free to ask me any questions you may have on my talk page. By the way, you should sign your name to your posts and comments with ~~~~.

I noticed you doing a lot of nice editing work, and wanted to invite you to join up. Thanks for your help so far! -- Netoholic @ 02:31, 2005 Feb 9 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Enterprise LTJG Rank

What is your source for the information you are putting into the Ranks and insignia of Starfleet article? Plase visit the talk page and provide a web link so we can verify the info you are proposing. Thanks for your cooperation -Husnock 01:23, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Anglo-Sino Alliance

I've removed your recently added speculation in Alliance (Firefly) about why there is no explicit reference to the "Anglo-Sino Alliance" in the show itself because it's not sourced, and Wikipedia has a policy about avoiding original research, which includes even informed speculations from fans of TV shows (like myself!). If you can cite a source for this information from the DVD commentary, a published interview with the show's creators, or a reference work like Serenity: The Visual Companion, editors and readers alike can verify the accuracy of such statements. Thank you for your cooperation. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 09:52, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Christina Hendricks reprising Saffron

I notice you added a line to Saffron about Christina Hendricks being interested in reprising this role. Do you have a source for this information? Thank you for your assistance. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 05:45, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] InterGalactic Banking Clan

Please use the preview function and check that links work before saving pages. I'm referring to your edits of General Grievous which result in links which are merely redirect pages. If you check the link before you save the page, you can change it skip the redirect page. Thanks a lot! --Tim 16:01, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Veggie Tales

Hello! Please stop adding "Minnesota Cuke and the Quest for Noah's Umbrella" to the VeggieTales article. That title has not been anounced and its origin is unknown (it was likely just made up by a wikipedian). Thanks a lot! :D -- authraw 17:02, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

I've responded to your note on my talk page. Just wanted to give you a heads-up! :) -- authraw 02:00, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] edits to Betazoid

Please stop adding the inaccurate text regarding the color of Betazoid iridi. Tomertalk 01:59, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Edit Summary Request

I have noted that you edit without an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. An edit summary is even more important if you delete any text; otherwise, people may think you're being sneaky or even vandalizing. Also, mentioning one change but not another one can be misleading to someone who finds the other one more important; add "and misc." to cover the other change(s). Thanks! -- Kukini 07:03, 29 November 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Jackson Spencer

Your incorrect edit to the Jackson Spencer section of the Galactica characters list has been fixed. He was as Major, not a Captain. Hbk314 03:23, 1 December 2006 (UTC)


Can you please stop making incorrect edits? Thanks. Hbk314 15:01, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Boston City Hall

I see that you disagree with my observation that many of the claims made the section titled "Reaction" have no basis in fact, and seem to be pure speculation, no? 70.106.36.134 01:30, 23 December 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Court Martial

I've reverted your edit to Court Martial (TOS episode) as all you did was remove a "citation needed" tag without adding citations. In the future, please do not remove tags asking for references if you do not provide them also. GertrudeTheTramp 07:03, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Tuvok and Kolinahr

What was the source of the paragraph you added to Kolinahr, please? The article has now been partly merged into Vulcan, but not that paragraph. If you have evidence, please add the material to the article Tuvok, which would need re-wrtiting at a couple of points as it currently implies that Tuvok did complete Kolinahr. - Fayenatic london (talk) 16:26, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Kumari (Star Trek)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Kumari (Star Trek), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Kumari (Star Trek). Theme (talk) 19:25, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vulcan High Command

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Vulcan High Command, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Vulcan High Command. Ejfetters 00:06, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Talas (Star Trek)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Talas (Star Trek), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Talas (Star Trek). Ejfetters 08:35, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Vulcan High Command

I have nominated Vulcan High Command, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vulcan High Command. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 05:23, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Earth governments (Star Trek)

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Earth governments (Star Trek), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 21:29, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of NX class starship

An editor has nominated NX class starship, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NX class starship and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 16:14, 7 January 2008 (UTC)