User talk:68.187.117.71

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] July 2007

Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Interracial pornography, you will be blocked from editing. Gscshoyru 01:16, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
I edit according to the rules of wikipedia. The entire article is nearly unslavagable, hence why it looks like a "blanking out". It's removed because it's grabage speculation and unproovable nonsense. I tried talking in discussion but no one would defend the nonense in this wiki so buh-bye it goes.
"speculation and unproovable nonsense" because you don't like it? Practically everything you deleted satisfied WP's Verifiability policy and was documented with reliable sources.
You say you tried to talk at Talk:Interracial pornography. Baloney! These are not constructive comments, nor are they efforts to "try talking":
  • there is little salvagable here, delete. Nothing. The whole thing needs to be deleted. What isn't completely wrong in the article is completely speculative and/or makes all sorts of blanket claims it does not at all support.
  • what's now left should be merged with pornography. I've removed the vast majority of the utter trash in this wiki, though somestill remains. If every bit is removed the article magically becomes a sinlge sentence or paragraph.
If you'd like to make constructive comments on the Talk page, or contribute to the article, please do. But cutting paragraph after paragraph because you don't like what they say is inappropriate, and it's not "editing according to the rules of wikipedia". — Malik Shabazz (Talk | contribs) 19:09, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Interracial pornography, you will be blocked from editing. — Malik Shabazz (Talk | contribs) 04:38, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia for vandalism. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of our neutrality policy are considered vandalism. Your block will expire in 24 hours. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. Jmlk17 05:04, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Not a vandal. No one has defended the riduclousness of the article i was editing, in fact several persons have made the exact same points i made in the talk page and they were left undefended. In my mind, that seems to be a consensus that the article needs changing. This seems to be a biased blocking merely because I'm not using my regular account and someone thinks they can push around IP editors"

Decline reason: "That does not seem to be the case, considering the comments quoted above and the claims made in relation to the content being in line with Wikipedia policy. — Vassyana 05:35, 10 July 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

You obviously didn't bother to check the dit history on the page, nor the overhwelming responses to the wiki in yhthe talk page. That's for the pathetic response. I guess I can write off moderators here of ever perfroming useful non-biased functions68.187.117.71 09:58, 11 July 2007 (UTC)


Your block request has been denied. Please do not re-add additional requests, or this page will be protected for the duration of the block. Ƙɽɨɱρᶓȶ 05:45, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Show me where it says you can only appeal once. You have half an hour before I re-appeal for this lifing this racist biased censorship.

Right above: "Do not replace this message with another unblock request or add another unblock request." I have protected your user talk page for the duration of your block. Ƙɽɨɱρᶓȶ 06:15, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Personal attacks

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Please stop calling me a racist and referring to my Wikipedia contributions as racist. Please read Wikipedia:Civility and Wikipedia:Assume good faith. — Malik Shabazz (Talk | contribs) 16:26, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your recent edits

Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button Image:Wikisigbutton.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 02:55, 21 September 2007 (UTC)