User talk:67.84.138.44

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, welcome to Wikipedia. Please check out Wikipedia:Welcome, newcomers and associated pages such as Wikipedia:Manual of Style for tips and info on writing and editing articles here. Cheers, -- Infrogmation 03:32, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Perhaps you meant to create WP:TPP instead of TPP? -- Grunt   ҈  21:55, 2004 Oct 8 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and gives you many benefits, including:

We hope you enjoy your time here on Wikipedia and that you choose to become a Wikipedian by creating an account. Feel free to ask me any questions you may have on my talk page. By the way, you should sign your name to your posts and comments with ~~~~. [[User:Neutrality|Neutrality (hopefully!)]] 23:02, Oct 15, 2004 (UTC) --- Hi, I notice you've been helping out a lot on the 'M and Missingno. articles. I've been commenting out their empty evolves from and evolves to boxes because that's reccomended in the WikiProject Pokédex, which is attempting to standardize the Pokémon articles here at Wikipedia. That's why I'm going to revert your edit to the Missingno. article. Just a heads up. Thanks for your time and welcome to the Wikipedia. ^_^ --Sparky the Seventh Chaos 18:42, Nov 20, 2004 (UTC)

On the subject of the Missingno. and 'M articles, could you please do research before making claims? I have documented evidence of Missingno. evolving into Kangaskhan (which is to be expected - Missingno. is an error message and so won't have been told not to evolve, and simply goes for the default increase-by-1 - Missingno. is slot 00, Kangaskhan is slot 01), so I'd appreciate it if you didn't contradict my proven truths. Thanks a lot. Thomas Winwood 23:17, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Many-worlds intepretation

Please see my comments in Talk:Many-worlds interpretation in regard to your recent edit on that article. Though a graphic showing an infinite splitting tree might be informative, (and thereis one below) one that refers to decisions is not. The splitting of the worlds is not related to any decision, at least not in any commonly accepted interpretation of quantum mechanics.

Thanks! CSTAR 05:02, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] 138-gon

What significance does this have (138 sides) to deserve its own article? Can you clarify that in the article? If not, it will probably be proposed for deletion. -- 02:30, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] RfD nomination of WP:HACM

I have nominated WP:HACM (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. WODUP 06:20, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] David Roberts (mayor)

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article David Roberts (mayor), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 09:29, 2 February 2008 (UTC)