User talk:67.174.32.71

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have ben blocked for one month for the legal threat on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Five O'clock Dog. See WP:NLT. User:Zoe|(talk) 05:14, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Threat?

All of the "Delete" users have violated many of the conditions for deletion. They are all recomending "delete" without a legal foundation, they have not contacted the Wikipedia foundation to ask for guidance from the designated/official Wikipedia IP attorney prior to recomending deletion. This is a childrens book stub. Everything on the Five O'clock Dog website is part of the story in the book and is relevent material. Are all childrens book stubs ruthless self promotion . . ?, is an admin or editors bio on their main user page "ruthless self-promotion" as they look for a higher paying job? or ask others to check out what great acomplishments they have made in their lives, hey just check out my bio on Wikipedia (Its not ruthless self-promotion - I promise). All the porno links and pics on Wikipedia are not ruthless self-promotion. The official rules of deletion ( if an article is repeatedly nominated for deletion, this is not in and of itself evidence that it should be deleted.) In some cases, repeated attempts to have an article deleted may even be considered disruptive. If in doubt, don't delete.) Did any "delete" folks follow this procedure. NO. Is there anyone else who wants to risk their Wikipedia credibility and just jump on the "delete" side without a Specific legal or factual reason for deletion. If all the "delete" folks want to invite a million people to talk about a children’s book stub, we are hereby not liable for any enticement of defamation or slander. We are also not reponsible for increased or decreased sales because of it. - The Publisher of Five O'clock Dog -20 january 2006 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.174.32.71 (talk • contribs) 05:08, 21 January 2006.

What legal threat? He simply made a legal statement thus DO NOT AGREE with your block. I do suggest to create an ID so we can CONSTRUCTIVELY discuss your article. "Zoe," how about you offer to HELP instead of tear down and DESTROY? Kmac1036 19:15, 21 January 2006 (UTC)