User talk:67.174.128.249

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please stop adding unsourced statements like you did to Fabula Nova Crystallis Final Fantasy XIII. Information on Wikipedia must be verifiable by reliable sources and it is the burden of the adder to provide such sources. Axem Titanium 21:42, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Fabula Nova Crystallis Final Fantasy XIII. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. benwildeboer(talk - contribs) 21:45, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Once again, stop adding poorly sourced information to Wikipedia. Final Fantasy Insider is not considered a reliable source. Also, adding such a trivial figure does nothing but reflect poorly on the encyclopedia as a whole. Obviously, that number has changed since it was published and it makes no sense to add it now. Axem Titanium 22:53, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
...why are you asking me? Axem Titanium 00:53, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Well, thanks, I suppose. If you must know, it's because of a ridiculous amount of discussion here. The template was always on the big side and there was finally an executive decision to promote uniformity along video game lines about series. Axem Titanium 01:12, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
I don't think it would be proper to try to change it now. Wait until the dust settles and dislike for it picks up. Axem Titanium 01:20, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
I ask you again to stop adding trivial and poorly sourced info to Fabula Nova Crystallis Final Fantasy XIII. If you do not, you may be blocked from editting Wikipedia and your site may be blacklisted. Axem Titanium 22:47, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

User:SmackallBot/anon SmackallBot 15:13, 31 December 2006 (UTC)


Contents

[edit] April 2007

Please do not introduce any form of vandalism to the userpages of other users, as you did to User:Wknight94. Thank you. Caltas 21:40, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to User:Wknight94. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. ROASTYTOAST 21:40, 27 April 2007 (UTC)


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User:Wknight94, you will be blocked from editing. Caltas 21:42, 27 April 2007 (UTC)


This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User:Wknight94, you will be blocked from editing. —DerHexer (Talk) 21:42, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

First, comments go on user talk pages, not user pages. Second, comments go at the bottom of the page, don't replace existing material with your comments. Third, be civil, namely don't call people idiots. Doing these things repeatedly is just going to get you blocked, so cut it out. --Minderbinder 21:43, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 1 week as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. John Reaves (talk) 21:47, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Talk:Naruto Uzumaki

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, we must insist that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not on Talk:Naruto Uzumaki. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Clyde (a.k.a Mystytopia) 01:49, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] You have been blocked

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 1 week for personal attacks. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. – Rianaऋ 20:57, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] more trolling

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for trolling and sockpuppetry. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. ··coelacan 08:23, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ash Ketchum, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Artichoker (Discussion) 00:29, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Ash Ketchum. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Artichoker (Discussion) 13:10, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made to User talk:Artichoker has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you. Artichoker (Discussion) 13:10, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Ash Ketchum has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. NauticaShades 22:55, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to List of Pokémon anime characters constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. NauticaShades 22:58, 9 June 2008 (UTC)