User talk:67.170.224.208

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page INTENTIONALLY de-cluttered.

Contents

[edit] User page blanking

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Paleorthid 06:07, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Are you READING what you're reverting, or just clicking away with whatever you bot tells you revert? You're skating the three revert rule yourself.
I am not convinced that my reply is of genuine interest to anybody, but for what it is worth: 1) No bots were used in the placing of that last warn message. 2) I am reading what I am reverting. 3) I have responded to concerns about my reverting of blanked talk page content_here. There I note that user:67.170.224.208 may not be aware of what constitutes a warning message. 4) I am not the only edito reverting blankd content on this user talk page. I am no where near the basic 3RR criteria, but even if I was, it doesn't apply to reverting vandalism.
I am not looking for a fight. I am taking a very measured approach in the hopes of reform. I do not feel particularly noble about pounding on this particular user talk page because the user has made a substantial number of positive contributions to WP. That said, it is overridingly important principle to me that warning messages should remain available for others to review without having to slog through the history files. Personally I would accept archiving content, and have no reason to believe this is not workable or would not be acceptable to other Wikipedians. -- Paleorthid 15:01, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Martin Luther (diplomat)

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you have a concern with the article, you can take it to the talk page - where you can discuss it with other editors, rather than going into a revert war. --Konstable 10:02, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sal Soghoian

Do you have any sources to back up your recent edits? AlistairMcMillan 13:09, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

You can ask him yourself, or anyone else in Apple product marketing. Sal works for Wiley Hodges in product marketing, not Worldwide Developer Relations. The Evangelists report to John Geleynse or David Harrington.
Please read WP:VERIFY. If you don't have any sources to back up your edits it is likely they will be reverted. AlistairMcMillan 13:53, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
Since you seem to be refusing to read WP:VERIFY, I'll quote some for you: Information on Wikipedia must be reliable. Facts, viewpoints, theories, and arguments may only be included in articles if they have already been published by reliable and reputable sources. Articles should cite these sources whenever possible. Any unsourced material may be challenged and removed. AlistairMcMillan 14:27, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

BTW I don't suppose there is any chance of you registering for an account and letting us know who you are is there? I'm assuming you work for Apple, right? AlistairMcMillan 14:28, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Madelyn Toogood

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Madelyn Toogood, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Dhartung | Talk 10:50, 23 April 2008 (UTC)