User talk:67.166.189.128

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Strictly Come Dancing, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ~~ [Jam][talk] 08:50, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Dancing with the Stars (U.S. TV series), without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. --Charitwo talk 12:26, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] My Message Back

I do not see the harm in my editing. The information is perfectly true and someone may want to know without doing it themselves. I would like to know how exactly my edits are harmful as I know I don't cause any harm. Why don't you actually read over to make sure that it is useless before asuming that it's not worthful. All of my edits I do are checked over and they are always true so next time think before you delete my article! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.166.189.128 (talk • contribs) 23:25, 3 March 2008

Well, there was no need to change the order of the scores (it make look better to put the highest score first, but those were the order they were danced), along with altering the order of the dances danced - that is the order they danced, so please don't re-arrange them.
Also, Wikipedia is not a list of random statistics so we do not need all the extra information you provided - while it is good, it makes the article far too long and turns priority away from the real context (which is really the various series information). ~~ [Jam][talk] 07:56, 4 March 2008 (UTC)