User talk:67.163.176.24

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Websites Critical of William Branham

Personally, I strongly dislike many of the websites that are critical of William Branham because they often carry distorted information, usually quoted out of context. However, if an article is to be a part of the Wikipedia collection, it needs to provide both pro and con links. The authenticity of William Branham's ministry will not be diminished by criticism. Rev107 16:36, 2 September 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Welcome

Welcome to Wikipedia

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

Someone using this IP address has made inappropriate edits, which have been reverted. If you did this, in the future please try to contribute in a more constructive manner. If you did not do this, you may wish to consider getting a username to avoid confusion with other editors.

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and there are many benefits of having a username. Without a username, your IP address is used to identify you.

If you need help see:

Here are a few more good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and timestamp. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Again, welcome! Vagr4nt 08:37, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edits to Perverted Justice

Please join the talk page to discuss the edits you have been attempting to make to the article. The content you keep removing has been developed and established by many editors over a long period of time. Your reasons for deleting are not sufficient. Please do not continue to disrupt the article. Vagr4nt 03:42, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding your edits to Perverted-Justice:

Your recent edit to Perverted-Justice (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II 03:09, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You are blocked for aggreviously violating Wikipedia's 3 reverts rule and edit warring on Perverted-Justice.

You are not permitted to repeatedly over and over again make the same changes like that. If you do it again, you will be blocked for longer periods of time.

Please discuss edits on the talk page and do not fight over content by reverting the article like that. Thank you. Georgewilliamherbert 03:14, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.