User talk:67.142.130.43

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

An editor has expressed a concern that this user may be a sock puppet of 12.150.11.25.
Please refer to editing habits and/or contributions; this policy subsection may also be helpful.

Account information: block log – current autoblocks – edits – logs
Attention:

This IP address, 67.142.130.43, is registered to HughesNet, and may be shared by multiple users. If the organization uses proxy servers or firewalls, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another and a block may be shared by many. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user. Alternatively, you can list the IP at Wikipedia:WikiProject on XFFs.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Contents

[edit] July 2006

Your recent edit to David Banner (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 22:13, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] November 2006

It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from an article. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. Glen 05:14, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

I did not touch the John Wayne article; he is not someone in whom I am interested in the slightest. I did not in any way, shape, form, or fashion vandalize the Hargitay profile and have only added career information and corrected a typo of my own. I cannot sign into Wiki because my carrier is a satellite, my Wiki name is Mowens35.67.142.130.43 16:44, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Well I am sorry if I have wrongly accused you of something you didn't do...I do make mistakes. Sorry if I have caused any trouble.__Seadog ♪ 17:42, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Then you should be very careful tossing around "last warnings". I make mistakes as well and when I do, I attempt to correct them ASAP and in correcting others' mistakes, I at least let them know why and when. To receive a "last warning" for no apparent reason and with no prior message as to concerns, etc, is disturbing, as it evidences some degree of temperamentalism on the warner's side.67.142.130.43 17:47, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
I have removed the warning...I do not know why I warned you about that article...I think I know what the problem is, eairler I was using Lupins anti-vandal tool. I was constantly reverting vandalism from a specific IP address, I think what happened is I accidently clicked the warn user button and placed the wrong message on the wrong talk page (yours). I am sorry for this mix-up, I am very new to the tool and I made an honest mistake. I hope I did not offend you.__Seadog ♪ 17:53, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] January 2007

Thank you for experimenting with the page North American Man/Boy Love Association on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Martial BACQUET 11:28, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] February 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to Dwight D. Eisenhower, you will be blocked. §†SupaSoldier†§ 01:38, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to Dwight D. Eisenhower, you will be blocked from editing. -- Jim Douglas (talk) (contribs) 01:51, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Dwight D. Eisenhower, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Drini 01:57, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Charles Dickens has been reverted, as it appears to be vandalism. Please do not vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing, or if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks – Qxz 00:56, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Chaz page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. CounterFX 22:38, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to Andrew. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. --Chris (talk) 22:39, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Taco Bell, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. --Chris (talk) 22:42, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to Taco Bell, you will be blocked from editing. If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. --Chris (talk) 22:43, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. --Chris (talk) 22:46, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] April 2007

Your recent edit to Goody Cole (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 14:24, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Matt Damon (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 21:31, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] May 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Lee Harvey Oswald, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Katieh5584 17:51, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Lee Harvey Oswald, you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. EliminatorJR Talk 17:52, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. --Gamaliel (Orwellian Cyber hell master) 18:21, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.

≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 20:03, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] June 2007

You have violated the three-revert rule. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from editing. --Gamaliel (Orwellian Cyber hell master) 18:50, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule . Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Alison ☺ 23:52, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Foxcroft Academy. Doing so violates Wikipedia's Wikipedia:verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Trusilver 05:24, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Slayer, are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. P.B. Pilhet 00:09, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Starter Box, you will be blocked from editing. Cheers, Lights 12:01, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] August 2007

Your recent edit to Kent School (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. For future editing tests use the sandbox. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 00:26, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] September 2007

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Kingdom Hearts (series), you will be blocked from editing. Kariteh 11:09, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Monica Lewinsky, you will be blocked from editing. --Nlu (talk) 20:56, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to White tiger (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 00:37, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to White tiger (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 00:39, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Irvington, New York has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. J.delanoygabsadds 19:00, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Ancient history (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 22:05, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Irvington, New York‎. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SWik78 (talk) 19:00, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to John Coy. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: John Coy was changed by 67.142.130.43 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-03-11T23:55:35+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 23:55, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Guitar Hero: Aerosmith, you will be blocked from editing. Lightsup55 ( T | C ) 15:06, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Category:1900 deaths has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Stwalkerster [ talk ] 21:52, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Dr. Feelgood (song), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Dr. Feelgood (song) was changed by 67.142.130.43 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-05-04T03:15:24+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 03:15, 4 May 2008 (UTC)