User talk:67.142.130.26

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This IP address, 67.142.130.26, is registered to Hughes Network Systems, and may be shared by multiple users. If the organization uses proxy servers or firewalls, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another and a block may be shared by many. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user. Alternatively, you can list the IP at Wikipedia:WikiProject on XFFs.


Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
Some ISPs use transparent proxies which cause problems logging in. If you find that you are automatically logged out just after you have logged in, and removing all your Wikipedia cookies does not fix the issue, try using the secure server (much slower) to bypass the proxy. This happens most often with some satellite ISPs (particularly HughesNet/DirecWay/DirecPC).

This is for the user of this IP address who identified as a descendant of Guillaume Postel in the talk on that article on 23 Jan 06. I would like to make some scholarly inquiries of your family bible. Please contact me through my talk page here. Thank you. Ddama 22:12, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] January 2007

  1. Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to LOL, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. John254 23:22, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
  2. This is your last warning.
    The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to User talk:John254, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. John254 23:26, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
  • You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. John254 23:46, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] February 2007

  1. Please stop. If you continue to vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to Tom Sawyer, Baron Sawyer, you will be blocked. — PMJ 19:34, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
  2. This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to The Star-Spangled Banner, you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Mr.Z-mantalk¢ 22:17, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
  • You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. Academic Challenger 22:23, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] March 2007

  1. Hi, the recent edit you made to Battle of Shiloh has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks – Qxz 15:51, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
  2. Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Vampire. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Pekaje 18:31, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
  3. Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Spear, even if your ultimate intention is to revert them. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -SpuriousQ (talk) 01:13, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] April 2007

  1. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Charlene Teters, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Badagnani 06:43, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
  2. This is your only warning. The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. --Imroy 06:47, 15 April 2007 (UTC)


[edit] May 2007

  1. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Elizabethan leisure, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
  2. You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Gamaliel (Orwellian Cyber hell master) 19:55, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 20:07, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] June 2007

  1. This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Thermal energy, you will be blocked from editing. --DSRH |talk 19:40, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
  • You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. TigerShark 19:55, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] July 2007

  1. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, 67.142.130.26! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule [A-Za-z][0-9]{2}\.photobucket\.com/albums/.*\.jpg, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links guidelines for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 17:30, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
  2. Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Billy Bob Thornton. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Xarr 22:13, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
  3. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Billy Bob Thornton, you will be blocked from editing. Xarr 22:15, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
  4. This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Billy Bob Thornton, you will be blocked from editing. Xarr 22:19, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
  • You have been blocked for a period of 1 month from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Khukri 22:29, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I am not personally responsible for the vandalism that my IP Address is being accused of. However, I know that there is a lot of vandalism on Wikipedia, as I have cleaned it up on more than one occasion. Every time I edit an article on Wikipedia, I am very careful to make sure that I leave the page in better condition than I found it in. I understand that blocking this IP Address will help to deter those who do vandalize Wikipedia, so I have no objection to that. I do edit Wikipedia fairly frequently and I would like to be able to continue (as I have done nothing wrong and should not be punished), but I am blocked from creating an account. I do not contest the blocking of this IP Address, however I would like to request help in obtaining a Wikipedia account so that this will no longer be an issue. Thank you. ~ESteen"


Decline reason: "Hi, unfortunately thers has been a significant amount of vandalism coming from this IP (that is probably shared by multiple users. You can edit using a registered account, though. Please contact us (with reference to this IP address) at unblock-en-l from your Internet Provider issued email address with your preferred username and an account will be created for you. Please ensure that any username you choose is not listed as taken here.— -- lucasbfr talk 15:41, 18 July 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

[edit] October 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Doyley Talk 16:01, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your recent edits

Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button Image:Wikisigbutton.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 05:47, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Eva Longoria. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Ðysepsion † Speak your mind 20:40, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Failure (disambiguation) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Alexfusco5 22:36, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Procrastination, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Pewwer42  Talk  07:15, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of Disney Channel Original Movies, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: List of Disney Channel Original Movies was changed by 67.142.130.26 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-02-15T01:59:34+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 01:59, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Zimbabwe, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Zimbabwe was changed by 67.142.130.26 (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2008-02-29T01:02:42+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 01:03, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Lake, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Lake was changed by 67.142.130.26 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2008-04-09T01:39:33+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 01:39, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Mia Hamm, you will be blocked from editing. Special-T (talk) 01:41, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] May 2008

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to La Plata High School, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. OnoremDil 23:05, 28 May 2008 (UTC)