User talk:67.142.130.23

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This IP address, 67.142.130.23, is registered to Hughes Network Systems, and may be shared by multiple users. If the organization uses proxy servers or firewalls, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another and a block may be shared by many. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user. Alternatively, you can list the IP at Wikipedia:WikiProject on XFFs.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Contents

[edit] February 2006

Thanks for experimenting with the page Tiger on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. - dharmabum (talk) 01:11, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] July 2006

Hi, the page you're editing is not 'fixed' by your edits. The edits you're making are pretty controversial, therefore, please discuss them on the talk page for that article first! --JoanneB 09:20, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Joe Trohman on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

[edit] August 2006

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. McPhail 01:00, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] November 2006

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to International Talk Like a Pirate Day. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --authraw 23:04, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Treasure Island. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Hu12 03:58, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] December 2006

It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Breed-specific legislation. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Casper2k3 07:04, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Gears of War (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 00:42, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] April 2007

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Eureka, Missouri, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Kla'quot 02:01, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 24 hours as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. PTO 16:15, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Devil. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -SpuriousQ (talk) 02:52, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Adoption_in_ancient_Rome, you will be blocked from editing. --Tomhannen 20:31, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repetitive vandalism. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Darthgriz98 20:44, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Tau (Warhammer 40,000), you will be blocked from editing. CzarNick 03:35, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] May 2007

The recent edit you made to Dutch language constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks – Gurch 03:01, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Dutch language, you will be blocked from editing.

Jebba 03:08, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 1 week as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. WjBscribe 03:09, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jacek Kendysz 21:53, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Roman Empire, you will be blocked from editing. BrianGV talk 21:54, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Tony Parker, you will be blocked from editing. Postoak 00:36, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for vandalizing Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires.

--Nlu (talk) 00:51, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

- - - - -Taixonay Excuse me but I think there is a mistake here. I do have an account and a password on Wikipedia, but for some reason it never shows me as logged in. My username is Taixonay and I can't make an appeal or send anyone an e-mail, because for some reason I'm never "logged in". I've only made two edits so far on Wikipedia, one being in the Avatar section sometime last year and the other being in the Okami (very recent) section because there were little ":(" in one of the summaries for a character named Rao. All those other pages I've never gone on before.

So if someone could fix the problem concerning my account, I think this problem could be resolved.

In light of your representation, I'll change the block to blocking anonymous only. You may need to check your browser settings to make sure that your browser accepts cookies, and then log in again. If you still have a problem, please add more information here. --Nlu (talk) 22:41, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
Looks like WJBscribe (talk · contribs) already did it. Again, please check your browser settings. --Nlu (talk) 22:43, 13 May 2007 (UTC)


This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I promise i will not vandalize anything anymore. Also i didnt vandalize most of the stuff you said i did"

Decline reason: "Sorry, there's been too much vandalism from this address. Please consider requesting an unblock using your signed-in account. — Yamla 16:33, 30 May 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

[edit] August 2007

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Colorado Avalanche. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Jmlk17 23:32, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Virginia Tech Massacre, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Einar Stefferud, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.Oo7565 05:36, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] November 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Yowie (cryptid), you will be blocked from editing. Zamphuor 03:38, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] December 2007

Your recent edit to List of Arthur characters (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 01:37, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Your recent edit to J. J. Thomson (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 01:50, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Same-sex marriage, you will be blocked from editing. Justin chat 00:35, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Hi, the recent edit you made to Virgin America has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. ➪HiDrNick! 02:29, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Printing press has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. —Animum (talk) 01:09, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Dennis Rader (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 21:36, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Pluto (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 23:50, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Lynyrd Skynyrd (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 05:42, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Talk:Jesus. ➪HiDrNick! 05:49, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism, as you did to Metaphor, will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Toddst1 (talk) 22:26, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Blue crab, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Blue crab was changed by 67.142.130.23 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2008-04-12T21:21:58+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 21:22, 12 April 2008 (UTC)