User talk:67.142.130.16

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This IP address has been repeatedly blocked from editing Wikipedia in response to abuse of editing privileges.
Further abuse from this IP address may result in an extended block.
Notify an administrator • contribs • block • block log
Attention:
This IP address, 67.142.130.16, is registered to Hughes Network Systems. In the event of vandalism from this address, efforts should be made to contact Hughes Network Systems to report abuse, which can be done here. Contact information can be viewed in the WHOIS report.
If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that it is possible for the owner of the IP, Hughes Network Systems, to determine who was making contributions from this address at a given time.
If you are the owner of this address responding to reports of inappropriate conduct from this address, you may find the contributions history and block log for this address helpful. Please feel free to contact any administrator who has blocked this address with questions (blocking admins will be listed in the block log).
An editor has expressed a concern that this user may be a sock puppet of 12.150.11.25.
Please refer to editing habits and/or contributions; this policy subsection may also be helpful.

Account information: block log – current autoblocks – edits – logs

Contents

[edit] Warnings

[edit] 2005

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. – Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 16:23, 30 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] 2006

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you were just trying to experiment, then use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Liamdaly620 20:50, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Darry2385 02:30, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 2007

Thank you for experimenting with the page Chris Webber on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Wizardman 01:30, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Kobe Bryant (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 04:02, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Stafford Senior High School has been reverted to the previous state due to vandalism.

Thank you for reverting your own change to the article William Moseley (actor). Please use the sandbox to experiment rather than making unencyclopedic changes to an article even if you immediately change them back. Eluchil404 04:31, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WP:3RR block

CWC, if you want to actually make changes to articles and have them stick, instead of having the articles locked and your IPs blocked, you're going to have to work toward consensus and compromise on the article talk pages. I don't care one way or the other, to be honest, and I don't care what these articles say as long as they meet WP:NPOV and WP:V. I'm not interested in these topics. But I won't let you edit war to get your way. You need to stop doing battle here, and start working toward consensus. I recommend that when your current blocks wear off, you register an account, and start using our dispute resolution channels. Or, you can fight and fight and fight, and I will just lock every article you touch. Your choice. ··coelacan 22:05, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to :Category:Television series by Fox Television Studios. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. KPH2293 01:36, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, 67.142.130.16! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule squidoo\.com, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links guidelines for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 21:59, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to San Serriffe. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Caltas (talk) 19:42, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for a period of time. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page, replacing your reason here with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time.

Please do not erase warnings on this page. Doing so may be considered disruptive. Kukini hablame aqui 19:43, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Dead or Alive 2, you will be blocked from editing. Talmage 02:36, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Grey DeLisle, you will be blocked from editing. Douglasmtaylor T/C 00:27, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked for a period of 2 weeks from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. DarkFalls talk 03:42, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unblock request

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "This is a Hughesnet shared IP address. My user name is User:Mind_meal, and I edit logged in and not logged in. When logged in, I must use https:secure.wikimedia.org due to my rolling IP address. When I want to do minor edits, I just use the regular Wikipedia site - which is much faster."

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

We apologize for the inconvenience, but due to the nature of vandalism originating from this transparent proxy, please continue to use our secure login. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 17:14, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
It is a shared IP address, and will affect more than one user, as it has. Are there not any guidelines for blocking shared Ip addresses? (67.142.130.16 17:39, 16 August 2007 (UTC))
Creating an account would be the best way to go about here. Corpx 17:40, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
Oh nevermind. I already have an account, as I stated. I just have to use https://secure.wikimedia.org because my IP address is rolling. The secure server takes very long, and when doing minor edits it is much easier to just perform them unlogged in. Well, I can't say I didn't tell you this block is punishing those unaffiliated with the vandal.(67.142.130.16 17:49, 16 August 2007 (UTC))

[edit] February 2008

Your recent edit to Eureka Seven (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 20:25, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

You have recently vandalized a Wikipedia page, and you are now being asked to stop this type of behavior. You're welcome to continue editing Wikipedia, so long as these edits are constructive. Please see Wikipedia's Blocking policy and what constitutes vandalism; such actions are not tolerated on Wikipedia, and are not taken lightly.

We hope that you will become a legitimate editor. Again, you are welcome here at Wikipedia, but remember not to vandalize or you will soon be blocked from editing.

If you feel you have received this message in error, it may be because you are using a shared IP address. Nevertheless, repeated vandalism from this address may cause you to be included in any future sanctions such as temporary blocks or bans. To avoid confusion in the future, we invite you to create a user account of your own. Chess piece Bubba73 (talk), 20:52, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Zoo has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Addshore (talk) 23:40, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked for a period of 1 month from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Alexf42 00:34, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Scientific method, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Scientific method was changed by 67.142.130.16 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-05-24T14:33:11+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 14:33, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Robins Island has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 18:43, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Robins Island constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Tombomp (talk) 18:47, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Slow, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Click23 (talk) 20:51, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Rossami (talk) 21:22, 29 May 2008 (UTC)