User talk:67.133.212.21

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This IP address, 67.133.212.21, is registered to the City of Bardstown, Kentucky, and may be shared by multiple users. If the organization uses proxy servers or firewalls, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another and a block may be shared by many. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user. Alternatively, you can list the IP at Wikipedia:WikiProject on XFFs.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Contents

[edit] Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. Your IP address will no longer be visible to other users, and you will be able to:

Feel free to ask me any questions you may have on my talk page. By the way, remember to sign and date your comments with four tildes (~~~~). VegaDark 00:14, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism

[edit] Your edit to Chuck Liddell

Your recent edit to Chuck Liddell (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 23:45, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Diego Sanchez. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. VegaDark 00:14, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Toshikatsu Matsuoka (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 14:41, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Chris Hero, you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. EliminatorJR Talk 23:04, 10 June 2007 (UTC)


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benoit family tragedy. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —DerHexer (Talk) 20:51, 10 August 2007 (UTC)


This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:DerHexer, you will be blocked from editing. —DerHexer (Talk) 21:31, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

This is your FINAL warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did with User:EliminatorJR's talk page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - NeutralHomer T:C 21:33, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 24 hours as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our polices concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated.—DerHexer (Talk) 21:34, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User talk:DerHexer

Please do not make personal attacks as you did at User talk:DerHexer. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images, especially those in violation of our Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons policy, will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Corvus cornix 21:39, 13 August 2007 (UTC)


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:DerHexer. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —DerHexer (Talk) 21:39, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] August 2007

This is your last warning.
If you continue to make personal attacks on other people as you did at User talk:DerHexer, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Gscshoyru 21:42, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
To edit, please log in.

Editing by anonymous users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled. Registered users, however, are still able to edit. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, please contact unblock-en-l for assistance. If possible, please use an email address issued by your ISP or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. We apologize for any inconvenience.

LessHeard vanU 21:46, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 1 month as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our polices concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. for long term repeated harassment of other users.Rlevse 01:24, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] September 2007

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 1 month as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. KillerChihuahua?!? 12:08, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Matt Serra, you will be blocked from editing. Staffwaterboy♂ 16:19, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 3 months as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Dreadstar † 17:00, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I did not make the edits you are claiming I have made, this is a computer used by 6 different people and I do not appreciate being inconvinienced by this."

Decline reason: "Understandable, and I apologize for any offense, but likewise we don't appreciate being inconvenienced by cleaning up after the less well-intentioned people on this IP -- if you register an account, you should be able to edit normally while logged in. – Luna Santin (talk) 01:01, 14 March 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

[edit] Unblock

I have noticed that you made a edit to your page concerning your block you can see here [1] i undid it you can use the

{{unblock}}

template to request for your account to be unblocked i do have to be honest it will be unlikely that the ban will be unlifted do to the negtive contributions that you made as seen here [2] If there is anything else please ask.


Thanks Staffwaterboy Talk♂ 13:09, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/72.200.124.29 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Staffwaterboy Talk 16:37, 7 April 2008 (UTC)